## Abstract A method termed liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction (LLLME) was utilized to extract 4‐t‐butylphenol, 4‐t‐octylphenol, 4‐n‐nonylphenol, and bisphenol‐A from water. The extracted target analytes were separated and quantified by high‐performance liquid chromatography using a fluorescence
Comparison of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and hollow fiber liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in water and biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography
✍ Scribed by Mohammad Saraji; Malihe Khalili Boroujeni; Ali Akbar Hajialiakbari Bidgoli
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 407 KB
- Volume
- 400
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1618-2650
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A simple and efficient method, ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐ultraviolet detection (HPLC‐UV), has been applied for the extraction and determination of some antioxidants (Irganox 1010, Irganox 1076 and Irg
## Abstract A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐fluorescence detector, has been developed for the determination of guaifenesin (GUA) enantiomers in human urine samples after an oral dose administ
## Abstract A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of
## Abstract A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method using __in situ__ halide exchange reaction to form ionic liquid (IL) extraction phase was developed to determine four insecticides (i.e. methoxyfenozide, tetrachlorvinphos, thiamethoxam, and diafenthiuron) in water samples. The p