## Abstract A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of
Application of liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of alkylphenols and bisphenol-A in water
✍ Scribed by Che-Yi Lin; Ming-Ren Fuh; Shang-Da Huang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 201 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A method termed liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction (LLLME) was utilized to extract 4‐t‐butylphenol, 4‐t‐octylphenol, 4‐n‐nonylphenol, and bisphenol‐A from water. The extracted target analytes were separated and quantified by high‐performance liquid chromatography using a fluorescence detector. In LLLME, the donor phase (i.e. water sample) was made weakly acidic by adding monobasic potassium phosphate (KH~2~PO~4~); the organic phase adopted was 4‐chlorotoluene; the acceptor phase (i.e. enriched extract) was 0.2 M tetraethylammonium hydroxide dissolved in ethylene glycol. This study solves a problem associated with the surface activity of long‐chain alkylphenolate ions, permitting LLLME to extract long‐chain alkylphenols. Experimental conditions such as acceptor phase composition, organic phase identity, acceptor phase volume, sample agitation, extraction time, and salt addition were optimized. The relative standard deviation (RSD, 2.0–5.8%), coefficient of determination (r^2^ 0.9977–0.9999), and detection limit (0.017–0.0048 ng/mL) of the proposed method were achieved under the selected optimized conditions. The method was successfully applied to analyses of lake and tap water samples, and the relative recoveries of target analytes from the spiked lake and tap water samples were 92.8–106.3 and 93.6–105.6%, respectively. The results obtained with the proposed method confirm this microextraction technique to be reliable for the monitoring of alkylphenols and bisphenol‐A in water samples.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The liquid–liquid microextraction (LLME) was developed for extracting sudan dyes from red wine and fruit juice. Room temperature ionic liquid was used as the extraction solvent. The target analytes were determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography. The extraction parameters were
## Abstract A simple, rapid and environment‐friendly technique of single‐drop liquid‐phase microextraction has been developed for the determination of sulfonamides in environmental water. Several important parameters including stirring rate, extraction solvent, extraction pH, salinity and extractio
## Abstract A new, selective and sensitive method has been developed for the determination of tricyclic antidepressant drugs, amoxapine and nortriptyline, in human blood plasma and serum, involving their reaction with allyl isothiocyanate and extraction of thiourea derivatives with water‐miscible o
## Abstract A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method using __in situ__ halide exchange reaction to form ionic liquid (IL) extraction phase was developed to determine four insecticides (i.e. methoxyfenozide, tetrachlorvinphos, thiamethoxam, and diafenthiuron) in water samples. The p
## Abstract Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐UV detection was applied in rat urine for the extraction and determination of tetrahydropalmatine (THP) and tetrahydroberberine (THB), both active components in __Rhizoma corydali