## Abstract A method termed liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction (LLLME) was utilized to extract 4‐t‐butylphenol, 4‐t‐octylphenol, 4‐n‐nonylphenol, and bisphenol‐A from water. The extracted target analytes were separated and quantified by high‐performance liquid chromatography using a fluorescence
Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of methomyl in natural waters
✍ Scribed by Guohui Wei; Yanyan Li; Xuedong Wang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 280 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of tetrachloroethane (as extraction solvent) was rapidly injected by syringe into a 5.00‐mL water sample containing the analyte, thereby forming a cloudy solution. After phase separation by centrifugation for 2 min at 4000 rpm, the enriched analyte in the settled phase (8 ± 0.2 μL) was at the bottom of the conical test tube. A 5.0‐μL volume of the settled phase was analyzed by HPLC–VWD. Parameters such as the nature and volume of the extraction solvent and the dispersive solvent, extraction time, and the salt concentration were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factor could reach 70.7 for a 5.00‐mL water sample and the linear range, detection limit (S/N = 3), and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 3–5000 ng/mL, 1.0 ng/mL, and 2.6%, respectively. River and lake water samples were successfully analyzed by the proposed method. Comparison of this method with solid‐phase extraction, solid‐phase microextraction, and single‐drop microextraction, indicates that DLLME combined with HPLC–VWD is a simple, fast, and low‐cost method for the determination of methomyl, and thus has tremendous potential in trace analysis of methomyl in natural waters.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A simple, rapid and environment‐friendly technique of single‐drop liquid‐phase microextraction has been developed for the determination of sulfonamides in environmental water. Several important parameters including stirring rate, extraction solvent, extraction pH, salinity and extractio
## Abstract This paper describes a new method for rapid and sensitive determination of diflubenzuron, flufenoxuron, triflumuron and chlorfluazuron in water samples by ultrasound‐assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction in combination with HPLC. Ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimid
## Abstract Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐UV detection was applied in rat urine for the extraction and determination of tetrahydropalmatine (THP) and tetrahydroberberine (THB), both active components in __Rhizoma corydali
## Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection for the determination of N-methyl carbamate pesticides in vegetables This paper described a simple, rapid and efficient method for the determination of N-methyl carbamate pesticide
## Abstract A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method using __in situ__ halide exchange reaction to form ionic liquid (IL) extraction phase was developed to determine four insecticides (i.e. methoxyfenozide, tetrachlorvinphos, thiamethoxam, and diafenthiuron) in water samples. The p