## Abstract A simple and efficient method, ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐ultraviolet detection (HPLC‐UV), has been applied for the extraction and determination of some antioxidants (Irganox 1010, Irganox 1076 and Irg
Determination of insecticides in water using in situ halide exchange reaction-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography
✍ Scribed by Songqing Li; Haixiang Gao; Jiaheng Zhang; Yubo Li; Bing Peng; Zhiqiang Zhou
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 220 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method using in situ halide exchange reaction to form ionic liquid (IL) extraction phase was developed to determine four insecticides (i.e. methoxyfenozide, tetrachlorvinphos, thiamethoxam, and diafenthiuron) in water samples. The preconcentration procedure, followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography and variable wavelength detectors (VWD), enabled the formation of the immiscible IL extraction phase; the insecticides were transferred into the IL phase simultaneously, which enhanced the efficiency and sufficiency, greatly shortening the operation time. The experimental parameters affecting the extraction efficiency including volume of extraction IL, extraction and centrifugation times, volume of the sample solution and exchanging reagent, and addition of organic solvent and salt were investigated and optimized. Under optimized conditions, the extractions yielded recoveries of the target analytes from 82 to 102%. The calibration curves were linear, and the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.9990 to 0.9999 under the concentration levels of 5–200 μg/L. The relative standard deviation (n=6) was 2.9–4.6%. The limits of detection (LODs) for the four insecticides were between 0.98 and 2.54 μg/L.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This paper describes a new method for rapid and sensitive determination of diflubenzuron, flufenoxuron, triflumuron and chlorfluazuron in water samples by ultrasound‐assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction in combination with HPLC. Ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimid
## Abstract Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐UV detection was applied in rat urine for the extraction and determination of tetrahydropalmatine (THP) and tetrahydroberberine (THB), both active components in __Rhizoma corydali
## Abstract A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of
Headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) has been applied to efficient enrichment of phenols such as 2-nitrophenol, 4-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and 2-naphthol from water samples based on 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C4MIM][PF6]) as an extractant. Some parameters
## Abstract The liquid–liquid microextraction (LLME) was developed for extracting sudan dyes from red wine and fruit juice. Room temperature ionic liquid was used as the extraction solvent. The target analytes were determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography. The extraction parameters were