## Abstract Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐UV detection was applied in rat urine for the extraction and determination of tetrahydropalmatine (THP) and tetrahydroberberine (THB), both active components in __Rhizoma corydali
Using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and liquid chromatography for determination of guaifenesin enantiomers in human urine
✍ Scribed by Mehdi Hatami; Khalil Farhadi; Assem Abdollahpour
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 207 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐fluorescence detector, has been developed for the determination of guaifenesin (GUA) enantiomers in human urine samples after an oral dose administration of its syrup formulation. Urine samples were collected during the time intervals 0–2, 2–4, and 4–6 h and concentration and ratio of two enantiomers was determined. The ratio of R‐(−) to S‐(+) enantiomer concentrations in urine showed an increase with time, with R/S ratios of 0.66 at 2 h and 2.23 at 6 h. For microextraction process, a mixture of extraction solvent (dichloromethane, 100 μL) and dispersive solvent (THF, 1 mL) was rapidly injected into 5.0 mL diluted urine sample for the formation of cloudy solution and extraction of enantiomers into the fine droplets of CH~2~Cl~2~. After optimization of HPLC enantioselective conditions, some important parameters, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, extraction time, temperature, pH, and salt effect were optimized for dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction process. Under the optimum extraction condition, the method yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 10 to 2000 ng/mL for target analytes. LOD was 3.00 ng/mL for both of the enantiomers.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The process of surfactant‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (SA‐DLLME) followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐UV detection was successfully applied for the extraction and determination of selected cannabinoids (cannabidiol, Δ^9^‐tetrahydrocannabinol, and cann
## Abstract Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was developed for the extraction and preconcentration of aromatic amine from environmental water. A suitable mixture of extraction solvent (100 μL, 1‐__butyl__‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophoshate) and dispersive solvent (750
## Abstract A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of
## Abstract A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method using __in situ__ halide exchange reaction to form ionic liquid (IL) extraction phase was developed to determine four insecticides (i.e. methoxyfenozide, tetrachlorvinphos, thiamethoxam, and diafenthiuron) in water samples. The p
## Abstract A simple and efficient method, ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐ultraviolet detection (HPLC‐UV), has been applied for the extraction and determination of some antioxidants (Irganox 1010, Irganox 1076 and Irg