Student Ratings: Validity, Utility, and Controversy
โ Scribed by James A. Kulik
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Weight
- 77 KB
- Volume
- 2001
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0271-0579
- DOI
- 10.1002/ir.1
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
This chapter reviews the conclusions on which most experts agree, cites some of the main sources of support for these conclusions, and discusses some dissenting opinions and the research support for those opinions.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The authors examine student ratings within a new framework that emphasizes six distinct aspects of validity: content, substantive, structural, generalizability, external, and consequential. They conclude that greater attention should be directed toward consequential validity, particular
This study examined the reliability and validity of assessor, peer, and selfratings of management skills. The sample was made up of261 undetgraduate business students at a large midwestern university. An assessment center process was used to examine the skills of students in a management skills cour
## Abstract Although student ratings of instruction are used to determine whether a person is teaching effectively, many people who use them are not aware of the extensive research base for them.
## Abstract In this chapter, the author examines important issues related to online reporting of student survey results.
The use of student ratings as a method of course and instructor evaluation has increased substantially over the past ten years. With this increase, a number of standardized instruments for assessing instructional effectiveness have become available. These instruments provide a reliable and relativel