## Abstract The authors outline a new identity for the professional psychologist termed Unified Professional Psychology (UPP). UPP combines recent movements toward a unified psychological science, an independent professional psychology, and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) doctoral training programs in ps
Interprofessional collaboration: Implications for Combined-Integrated doctoral training in professional psychology
✍ Scribed by Carolyn E. Johnson; Anne L. Stewart; Mary M. Brabeck; Vida S. Huber; Hank Rubin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 107 KB
- Volume
- 60
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is becoming “best practice” in the field of professional psychology and other health care professions. It was named as a core competency at Competencies 2002 and the Consensus Conference and has been endorsed by the American Psychological Association on several occasions. The authors provide a definition of IPC, present conceptual, scholarly, and pragmatic support for IPC, and offer guidance on how Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) doctoral programs in professional psychology can include IPC to ensure students are well equipped to respond to a client's complex needs. Furthermore, although C‐I programs might be particularly well prepared to incorporate IPC into their training, it is argued that programs in the single practice areas of clinical, counseling, and school psychology also may benefit from the inclusion of IPC. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Although new to many members of the psychological community, the notion of a “combined” model of training has been in existence for nearly 30 years (Beutler & Fisher, 1994). The present article is intended to outline the benefits and advantages of the Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model. Fo
## Abstract This article considers the development of a global training curriculum and qualification in professional psychology, with particular emphasis on the Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model. The C‐I model exposes professional psychology trainees to two or more of the practice areas (i.e., clinic
## Abstract The history of doctoral training in psychology is reviewed, with special emphasis on the development of training models for applied psychology. Among applied psychology doctoral programs, most label themselves as being one of the three currently recognized practice areas: clinical, coun
## Abstract This article was developed in response to the proceedings of the __Consensus Conference on Combined and Integrated Doctoral Training in Psychology__ held at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, VA, May 2 to 4, 2003. The authors approach the recommendations of the conference from th
## Abstract Doctoral training programs in psychology are accredited by the American Psychological Association in four areas: Clinical, Counseling, School, and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) psychology. Each area of doctoral preparation in psychology has its own council, which represents its interests wi