## Abstract The history of doctoral training in psychology is reviewed, with special emphasis on the development of training models for applied psychology. Among applied psychology doctoral programs, most label themselves as being one of the three currently recognized practice areas: clinical, coun
Voices of the five doctoral training councils in psychology: Seeking common ground on Combined-Integrated doctoral training in psychology
✍ Scribed by Jessica Blom-Hoffman; Barbara F. Okun; Karin Lifter; Roger Blashfield; Susan L. Crowley; Rodney K. Goodyear; William Strein; LaPearl Logan Winfrey
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 83 KB
- Volume
- 60
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Doctoral training programs in psychology are accredited by the American Psychological Association in four areas: Clinical, Counseling, School, and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) psychology. Each area of doctoral preparation in psychology has its own council, which represents its interests within the field and to external constituents. Despite the fact that Combined‐Integrated training programs have existed since the mid‐1970s, the Consortium representing this area's interests only formed in the past two years. The purpose of this article was to obtain input from representatives of all five training councils regarding the role of the newly formed council in relation to the other councils and the role of Combined‐Integrated training. We begin with a brief description of each of the five councils. We then summarize the representatives' responses to narrative questions regarding advantages and disadvantages associated with meeting to discuss the combined model. Finally, common and divergent themes across the councils in training psychologists are presented, and the future role for Combined‐Integrated programs is discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Although new to many members of the psychological community, the notion of a “combined” model of training has been in existence for nearly 30 years (Beutler & Fisher, 1994). The present article is intended to outline the benefits and advantages of the Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model. Fo
## Abstract Is it possible and advisable for the profession of psychology to articulate and endorse a common, generalist, and integrative framework for the education and training of its students? At the __Consensus Conference on Combined and Integrated Doctoral Training in Psychology__, held at Jam
## Abstract Doctoral students in professional psychology face broad challenges, such as changing market demands and increased competition for careers in traditional practice settings. To prepare for these demands, students must decide how much and when to specialize, if at all, predoctorally. Compl
## Abstract This special series of articles on the __Consensus Conference__ and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model of doctoral training in professional psychology consists of 13 articles in two successive volumes of the __Journal of Clinical Psychology__. Six articles are presented in Part 1 (Vol. 60,
## Abstract This special series of articles on the __Consensus Conference__ and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model of doctoral training in professional psychology consists of 13 articles in two successive issues of the __Journal of Clinical Psychology__. Six articles were presented in Part 1 (Vol. 60,