𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A history of Combined-Integrated doctoral training in psychology

✍ Scribed by Larry E. Beutler; Abraham Givner; Barbara A. Mowder; Daniel Fisher; Ronald E. Reeve

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
158 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The history of doctoral training in psychology is reviewed, with special emphasis on the development of training models for applied psychology. Among applied psychology doctoral programs, most label themselves as being one of the three currently recognized practice areas: clinical, counseling, and school psychology; however, since the 1970s, APA also has accredited “combined” programs. The history of the development of the combined model is traced, including information from the programs themselves about the manner in which each evolved. Recently, new interest in the combined category —or Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) as these programs wish to become known—has emerged, and an organization representing these programs has formed. The C‐I model is described, and the potential that the model may serve as a template for the future of professional training in psychology is discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Voices of the five doctoral training cou
Voices of the five doctoral training councils in psychology: Seeking common ground on Combined-Integrated doctoral training in psychology
✍ Jessica Blom-Hoffman; Barbara F. Okun; Karin Lifter; Roger Blashfield; Susan L. 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Doctoral training programs in psychology are accredited by the American Psychological Association in four areas: Clinical, Counseling, School, and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) psychology. Each area of doctoral preparation in psychology has its own council, which represents its interests wi

Interprofessional collaboration: Implica
Interprofessional collaboration: Implications for Combined-Integrated doctoral training in professional psychology
✍ Carolyn E. Johnson; Anne L. Stewart; Mary M. Brabeck; Vida S. Huber; Hank Rubin 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 107 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is becoming “best practice” in the field of professional psychology and other health care professions. It was named as a core competency at __Competencies 2002__ and the __Consensus Conference__ and has been endorsed by the American Psychological As

Unified professional psychology: Implica
Unified professional psychology: Implications for the Combined-Integrated model of doctoral training
✍ Gregg R. Henriques; Robert J. Sternberg 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The authors outline a new identity for the professional psychologist termed Unified Professional Psychology (UPP). UPP combines recent movements toward a unified psychological science, an independent professional psychology, and Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) doctoral training programs in ps

From the horse's mouth: A case for Combi
From the horse's mouth: A case for Combined-Integrated doctoral training in professional psychology
✍ Susan L. Crowley; Gary Peterson 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Although new to many members of the psychological community, the notion of a “combined” model of training has been in existence for nearly 30 years (Beutler & Fisher, 1994). The present article is intended to outline the benefits and advantages of the Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model. Fo

Development of a global curriculum for p
Development of a global curriculum for professional psychology: Implications of the Combined-Integrated model of doctoral training
✍ Gerald H. Burgess; Lee G. Sternberger; Juan Jose Sanchez-Sosa; Ingrid Lunt; Crai 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 135 KB

## Abstract This article considers the development of a global training curriculum and qualification in professional psychology, with particular emphasis on the Combined‐Integrated (C‐I) model. The C‐I model exposes professional psychology trainees to two or more of the practice areas (i.e., clinic

Back to our future? The Consensus Confer
Back to our future? The Consensus Conference and Combined-Integrated model of doctoral training in professional psychology
✍ Craig N. Shealy; Harriet C. Cobb; Susan L. Crowley; Paul Nelson; Gary Peterson 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 114 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Is it possible and advisable for the profession of psychology to articulate and endorse a common, generalist, and integrative framework for the education and training of its students? At the __Consensus Conference on Combined and Integrated Doctoral Training in Psychology__, held at Jam