𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

📁

Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs

✍ Scribed by Deborah K. Heikes


Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
Year
2023
Tongue
English
Leaves
237
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This book considers whether we can be epistemically responsible for undesirable beliefs, such as racist and sexist ones. The problem with holding people responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an “undesirable belief” will differ among various epistemic communities; second, it is not clear what responsibility we have for beliefs simpliciter; and third, inherent in discussions of socially constructed ignorance (like white ignorance) is the idea that society is structured in such a way that white people are made deliberately unaware of their ignorance, which suggests their racial beliefs are not epistemically blameworthy.
This book explores each of these topics with the aim of establishing the nature of undesirable beliefs and our responsibility for these beliefs with the understanding that there may well be (rare) occasions when undesirable beliefs are not epistemically culpable.

✦ Table of Contents


Contents
1: Epistemic Responsibility: An Overview
1.1 The Trouble with “Facts”
1.2 How Epistemology Undermines Responsibility
1.3 Exculpatory Ignorance
1.4 The Problem of Culpability
1.5 Three Questions
References
2: What Is Undesirable Belief?
2.1 Truth and Undesirability
2.2 Whose Undesirability?
2.3 Finding Fact in the Midst of Conflicting Value
2.4 Transformational Criticism and Undesirability
2.5 The Challenge of Intellectual Authority
2.6 Undesirable Belief and Exculpatory Reasons
2.7 Taking Social Acceptability Seriously
References
3: Can There Be Epistemic Responsibility?
3.1 Epistemic Voluntarism? Belief as Habits of Action
3.2 The Intractability of Undesirability
3.3 Salvaging Epistemic Responsibility
3.4 Doxastic Intentions and Epistemic Responsibility
3.5 Doxastic Influence and Responsibility
3.6 Epistemic Humility/Epistemic Hubris
3.7 Epistemic Communities and the Possibility of Voluntarism
3.8 Joint Epistemic Responsibility
References
4: What About the Exculpatory Effects of Ignorance?
4.1 Varieties of Ignorance and Exculpation
4.2 Immersion and Responsibility Within Socially Constructed Ignorance
4.3 Deliberate Ignorance and Responsibility
4.4 Anti-individualism and Epistemic Heroism
4.5 Holding Out for Epistemic Heroes
4.6 When Should We Know?
4.7 Whose Ignorance? Whose Responsibility?
References
5: It’s Not My Fault
5.1 Epistemic Individualism Be Damned
5.2 Epistemic Dependence and Individual Responsibility
5.3 Epistemic Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Becoming a Cognitive Newborn
5.4 It May Really Not Be My Fault
References
Author Index
Subject Index


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Epistemic Responsibility
✍ Lorraine Code 📂 Library 📅 2020 🏛 State University of New York Press 🌐 English

<i>Develops a new kind of epistemological position that highlights virtue over more standard epistemological theories.</i> Having adequate knowledge of the world is not just a matter of survival but also one of obligation. This obligation to “know well” is what philosophers have termed “epistemic

Responsibility : the epistemic condition
✍ Philip Robichaud, Jan Willem Wieland 📂 Library 📅 2017 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English

Philosophers have long agreed that moral responsibility might not only have a freedom condition, but also an epistemic condition. Moral responsibility and knowledge interact, but the question is exactly how. Ignorance might constitute an excuse, but the question is exactly when. Surprisingly enough,

The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Be
✍ Lisa Bortolotti 📂 Library 📅 2020 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English

In an ideal world, our beliefs would satisfy norms of truth and rationality, as well as foster the acquisition, retention, and use of other relevant information. In reality, we have limited cognitive capacities and are subject to motivational biases on an everyday basis. We may also experience impai

Blameworthy Belief: A Study in Epistemic
✍ Nikolaj Nottelmann 📂 Library 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English

<p><P>Believing the wrong thing may sometimes have drastic consequences. The question as to when a person is not only ill-guided, but genuinely at fault for holding a particular belief is an important one: It touches upon the roots of our understanding of such notions as criminal negligence and mora