๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Epistemic Responsibility

โœ Scribed by Lorraine Code


Publisher
State University of New York Press
Year
2020
Tongue
English
Leaves
308
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Develops a new kind of epistemological position that highlights virtue over more standard epistemological theories.

Having adequate knowledge of the world is not just a matter of survival but also one of obligation. This obligation to โ€œknow wellโ€ is what philosophers have termed โ€œepistemic responsibility.โ€ In this innovative and eclectic study, Lorraine Code explores the possibilities inherent in this concept as a basis for understanding human attempts to know and understand the world and for discerning the nature of intellectual virtue. By focusing on the idea that knowing is a creative process guided by imperatives of epistemic responsibility, Code provides a fresh perspective on the theory of knowledge.

From this new perspective, Code poses questions about knowledge that have a different focus from those traditionally raised in the two leading epistemological theories, foundationalism and coherentism. While not rejecting these approaches, this new position moves away from a primary concentration on determinate products and towards an examination of ever-changing processes. Arguing that knowledge never exists as an ungrounded abstraction but rather emerges through dialogue between variously authoritative โ€œknowersโ€ situated within particular social and historical contexts, she draws extensively on examples from lived social experience to illustrate the ways in which human beings have long tried to recognize and meet their epistemic responsibilities.

This edition of Epistemic Responsibility includes a new preface from Lorraine Code.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Contents
Preface to the second edition
Preface
1 Introduction: Epistemic Responsibility
I Intellectual Virtue
2 Father and Son: A Case Study
Introduction: The Gosse Case
Foundations, Coherence, and Narrative
Some Interim Conclusions
3 Toward a โ€œResponsibilistโ€ Epistemology
โ€œThe Raft and the Pyramidโ€
Epistemological Precedents
Responsibilism
Virtueโ€”and Intellectual Virtues
Virtuous Character
A Subjectโ€™s Nature, Environment, Epistemic Community
Recommendations
4 The Ethics of Belief
The Ethical and the Epistemic
The Ethics of Belief
Belief and Choice
Implications
II Cognitive Activity
5 The Knowing Subject
Theoretical Basis
Kant cum Piaget: Steps Toward the Personal
Knowers As Persons
Epistemology and Human Nature
Consequences
6 Realism and Understanding
Realism, Truth, and Intellectual Virtue
Normative Realism
Subjectivism and Dogmatism
Understanding
The Lebenswelt: Cognitive Practice
7 Epistemic Community
Community and Commonability
Cognitive Interdependence and Trust
Contracts, Forms of Life, and Practices
Epistemological Altruism
Consequences
III Epistemic Life
8 Literature, Truth, and Understanding
Fiction as a Source of Understanding
Responsibility for Truth
The Case of Styron: The Factual and the Fictional
Implications
9 Cognitive Practice
The Division of Intellectual Labor
Polanyi and/or Foucault
Education, Authority, and the Epistemic Community
10 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Responsibility : the epistemic condition
โœ Philip Robichaud, Jan Willem Wieland ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2017 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Philosophers have long agreed that moral responsibility might not only have a freedom condition, but also an epistemic condition. Moral responsibility and knowledge interact, but the question is exactly how. Ignorance might constitute an excuse, but the question is exactly when. Surprisingly enough,

Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable
โœ Deborah K. Heikes ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2023 ๐Ÿ› Palgrave Macmillan ๐ŸŒ English

<span>This book considers whether we can be epistemically responsible for undesirable beliefs, such as racist and sexist ones. The problem with holding people responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an โ€œundesirable beliefโ€ will differ among various epistemic communities

Virtue Epistemology: Essays in Epistemic
โœ Abrol Fairweather, Linda Zagzebski ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press, USA ๐ŸŒ English

Virtue epistemology is an exciting, new movement receiving an enormous amount of attention from top epistemologists and ethicists; this pioneering volume reflects the best work in that vein. Featuring superb writing from contemporary American philosophers, it includes thirteen never before publishe

Virtue Epistemology: Essays in Epistemic
โœ Abrol Fairweather, Linda Zagzebski (Editors) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐ŸŒ English

Virtue epistemology is an exciting, new movement receiving an enormous amount of attention from top epistemologists and ethicists; this pioneering volume reflects the best work in that vein. Featuring superb writing from contemporary American philosophers, it includes thirteen never before publishe

Virtue Epistemology: Essays in Epistemic
โœ Abrol Fairweather, Linda Zagzebski (Editors) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐ŸŒ English

Virtue epistemology is an exciting, new movement receiving an enormous amount of attention from top epistemologists and ethicists; this pioneering volume reflects the best work in that vein. Featuring superb writing from contemporary American philosophers, it includes thirteen never before publishe