𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Responsibility : the epistemic condition

✍ Scribed by Philip Robichaud, Jan Willem Wieland


Publisher
Oxford University Press
Year
2017
Tongue
English
Leaves
312
Edition
First edition
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Philosophers have long agreed that moral responsibility might not only have a freedom condition, but also an epistemic condition. Moral responsibility and knowledge interact, but the question is exactly how. Ignorance might constitute an excuse, but the question is exactly when. Surprisingly enough, the epistemic condition has only recently attracted the attention of scholars. This volume sets the agenda. Sixteen new essays address the following central questions: Does the epistemic condition require akrasia? Why does blameless ignorance excuse? Does moral ignorance sustained by one's culture excuse? Does the epistemic condition involve knowledge of the wrongness or wrongmaking features of one's action? Is the epistemic condition an independent condition, or is it derivative from one's quality of will or intentions? Is the epistemic condition sensitive to degrees of difficulty? Are there different kinds of moral responsibility and thus multiple epistemic conditions? Is the epistemic condition revisionary? What is the basic structure of the epistemic condition?

✦ Subjects


Responsibility.;Virtue epistemology.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Epistemic Responsibility
✍ Lorraine Code πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› State University of New York Press 🌐 English

<i>Develops a new kind of epistemological position that highlights virtue over more standard epistemological theories.</i> Having adequate knowledge of the world is not just a matter of survival but also one of obligation. This obligation to β€œknow well” is what philosophers have termed β€œepistemic

Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable
✍ Deborah K. Heikes πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2023 πŸ› Palgrave Macmillan 🌐 English

<span>This book considers whether we can be epistemically responsible for undesirable beliefs, such as racist and sexist ones. The problem with holding people responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an β€œundesirable belief” will differ among various epistemic communities

Reshaping the University: Responsibility
✍ Rauna Kuokkanen πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› UBC Press 🌐 English

<p><span>In the past few decades, the narrow intellectual foundations of the university have come under serious scrutiny. Previously marginalized groups have called for improved access to the institution and full inclusion in the curriculum. </span><span>Reshaping the University</span><span> is a ti