Why is the polymerase chain reaction resistant to in vitro evolution?
โ Scribed by J. J. Bull; C. M. Pease
- Book ID
- 104651290
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 505 KB
- Volume
- 41
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-2844
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A variety of methods have been developed to amplify DNA and RNA. These methods vary in their susceptibility to evolve new molecular species differing from the starting template. PCR is exceptionally resistant to in vitro evolution, whereas methods such as Q[3 replicase and 3SR are much less robust. This paper develops some simple mathematical models which suggest that PCR is resistant to in vitro evolution because the reaction controls replication in discrete cycles: fast replication is of little advantage during PCR because the reaction limits fast replicators as well as slow ones to a single copy per cycle. In contrast, continuous (isothermal) reactions, as in the Q~ replicase reaction, favor fast replicators. The advantage of fast replication is compounded in continuous reactions, because a fast replicator can complete many generations of replication during the time it takes a slow replicator to complete one generation. These models suggest that continuous amplication protocols will never achieve the robustness against in vitro evolution observed with PCR.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
ogy as with DSPE-PEG 2000. Since the concentrations of PEG 5000 containing proteins could also be measured by Skoog's method (13), we believe that this modified method would also work. In conclusion, a simple and direct colorimetric method, modified from Skoog's PEG measurement method (13), for det
Recently, an enzymatic amplification method, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was modified to amplify a sequence of a drug resistance gene. The PCR assay can confirm data achieved by conventional molecular biology techniques, while requiring less time and fewer patient cells. It can be quantitat
## Objective: To compare the reliability of ligase chain reaction (lcr) to polymerase chain reaction (pcr) in detecting chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections. ## Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 486 patients at risk for chlamydial infection of the endocervix. we obtained two e