𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size

✍ Scribed by Cindy A. Ryan; Joel G. Chaney; Petra S. Kern; Grace Y. Patlewicz; David A. Basketter; Catherine J. Betts; Rebecca J. Dearman; Ian Kimber; G. Frank Gerberick


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
204 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0260-437X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a skin sensitization test that provides animal welfare benefits. To reduce animal usage further, a modified version (rLLNA) was proposed. Conducting the rLLNA as a screening test with a single high dose group and vehicle control differentiated accurately between skin sensitizers and non‐sensitizers. This study examined whether a reduction in animal number/group is feasible. Historical data were utilized to examine the impact of conducting the rLLNA with two mice/group. To assess the effect on the stimulation index (SI) 41 datasets with individual animal data derived using five mice/group were analysed. SIs were calculated on all possible combinations of two control and two high dose group disintegrations per minute (dpm) values. For 25 of 33 sensitizer datasets, > 96% of possible dpm combinations resulted in a calculated SI > 3. The lowest percentages of positive SIs were observed with weak allergens when, in the standard LLNA, the mean SIs would have been nearer to the threshold value of 3. The results indicate that moderate, strong and extreme allergens are more likely than weak allergens to be identified as sensitizers when group sizes of two mice are used within the rLLNA. It is concluded that a rLLNA with two mice/group would display decreased sensitivity and is inappropriate for use in hazard identification. Copyright Β© 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of mouse strains using the lo
✍ Michael R Woolhiser; Albert E Munson; B.Jean Meade πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 78 KB

The local lymph node assay (LLNA), as recommended by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), only allows for the use of CBA mice. The objective of these studies was to begin to assess the response of chemical sensitizers in the LLNA across six strain

Evaluation of lymphocyte proliferation b
✍ C. Boussiquet-Leroux; G. Durand-Cavagna; K. Herlin; D. Holder πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 913 KB

A modified version of the local lymph node assay (LLNA) is presented, using bromodeoxyuridine to label proliferating lymphocytes. Cell counting is done on mid-sagittal sections of individual nodes under light microscopy. Two irritants (sodium lauryl sulfate and salicylic acid), four allergens of var

The local lymph node assay: An interlabo
✍ R. J. Dearman; L. S. P. Ramdin; I. Kimber; E. W. Scholes; D. A. Basketter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 476 KB

The murine local lymph node assay is a predictive method for the identification of skin-sensitizing chemicals in which activity is measured as a function of proliferative activity induced in lymph nodes draining the site of exposure. In the present study, the induction by topically applied chemicals