✦ LIBER ✦

The assessment of developmentally disabled children with the WISC-R, binet and other tests

✍ Scribed by L. M. Raskin; A. S. Bloom; S. H. Klee; A. Reese

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1978
Tongue: English
Weight: 246 KB
Volume: 34
Category: Article
ISSN: 0021-9762
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:1<111::aid-jclp2270340125>3.0.co;2-y

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Tests to Detect Organic Brain Dysfunction 111 literate population. The last is of great advantage in developing countries when a substantial proportion of the population is still illiterate.

The true predictive capacity of the battery and the scoring procedure will be fully realized by further research with different groups of patients and normals in different settings. Attempts also should be made to determine whether the predictive capacity can be improved by adding new (but simple) tests.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A comparison of WISC-R and stanford-bine

A comparison of WISC-R and stanford-binet intelligence scale classifications of developmentally disabled children

✍ Allan S. Bloom; Larry M. Baskin; Anabel H. Reese 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 252 KB 👁 1 views

of Medicine WISC-Rs and Stanford-Binets were administered to 50 children with developmental disabilities referred for comprehensive evaluations. Although the two IQs correlated highly and significantly, it was found that 5470 of the children received different classifications using the two instrumen

IQ discrepancies between the binet and W

IQ discrepancies between the binet and WISC-R in children with developmental problems

✍ Allan S. Bloom; Anabel Reese; Lisa Altshuler; C. Lynn Meckler; Larry M. Raskin 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB 👁 2 views

Administered the Stanford-Binet and WISC-R to 121 children with developmental problems. Twenty-eight of the children received absolute differences of 12 points or greater between the Binet and WISC-R FSIQs, with a mean difference of 16.8 and range of 12 to 28 points. While most of these discrepancie

A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbre

A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbreviated and complete forms for developmentally disabled children

✍ Allan S. Bloom; Steven H. Klee; Larry M. Raskin 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 339 KB 👁 2 views

Three abbreviated versions of the Stanford-Binet were reviewed and compared for 50 chldren with developmental disabilities. The children ranged in age from 6 years -0 months to 15 years -11 months. While the IQs obtained from the abbreviated forms correlated highly with the com lete Binet I&, it was

Investigation of the WISC-R for use with

Investigation of the WISC-R for use with retarded children: Correlation with the 1972 Stanford-Binet and comparison of WISC and WISC-R profiles

✍ Alan S. Kaufman; John Van Hagen 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 362 KB 👁 2 views

Correlations between the stanford-binet:

Correlations between the stanford-binet: Fourth edition and the WISC-R with a learning disabled population

✍ Leadelle Phelps; M. Christine Bell; Michael J. Scott 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 192 KB 👁 2 views

A comparison of the performance of cogni

A comparison of the performance of cognitively disabled Children on The WISC-R and WISC-III

✍ Dubi Lufi; Jim Parish-Plass; L. M. Bolen; K. S. Aichinger; C. W. Hall; R. E. Web 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 473 KB 👁 2 views