𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Segregation analysis of 389 Icelandic pedigrees with Breast and prostate cancer

✍ Scribed by Agnes B. Baffoe-Bonnie; Lambertus A.L.M. Kiemeney; Terri H. Beaty; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Audrey H. Schnell; Helgi Sigvaldason; Guriur Ólafsdóttir; Laufey Tryggvadóttir; Hrafn Tulinius


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
134 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Breast cancer and prostate cancer are the most commonly occurring cancers in females and males, respectively. The objective of this project was to test the hypothesis that breast cancer in females and prostate cancer in males represent homologous cancers that may be controlled by one or more common unidentified genes that may explain some of the observed familial aggregation. We modeled the transmission of a breast‐prostate cancer phenotype in 389 pedigrees ascertained through a breast cancer proband drawn from the Icelandic Cancer Registry. Assuming that age at diagnosis of this combined phenotype followed a logistic distribution, segregation analyses were performed to evaluate residual parental effects, a sibship covariate, and a dichotomous cohort effect. The most parsimonious model was a Mendelian codominant model, which could partly explain the familial aggregation of both cancers. Inheritance of a putative high‐risk allele (A) predicted gender‐specific mean ages of onset for females as 53.8 years, 59.7 years, and 65.6 years for the putative AA, AB, and BB genotypes, respectively. Similarly, the predicted means were 73.7 years, 75.6 years, and 78.3 years, respectively, among males. Under this codominant model, the lifetime risk of a woman being affected was 19% by age 80 years. This implies that when prostate cancer among male relatives of breast cancer probands (unselected for family history or early‐onset disease) is considered a pleiotrophic effect of the same gene that increases the risk for breast cancer, women are predicted to have a less than 1 in 5 risk of developing breast cancer when they carry the putative high‐risk allele. However, this is a higher risk than in the general Icelandic population. Our results suggest that BRCA2 mutations alone are inadequate to explain all of the excess clustering of prostate cancer cases in families of breast cancer probands, and that additional genes conferring excess risk to both breast and prostate cancer may exist in this population. Genet. Epidemiol. 23:349–363, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer: S
✍ Agnes B. Baffoe-Bonnie; Terri H. Beaty; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Lambertus A.L.M. 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 96 KB 👁 2 views

A genetic epidemiologic investigation of breast cancer involving 389 breast cancer pedigrees including information on 14,721 individuals from the Icelandic population-based cancer registry is presented. Probands were women born in or after 1920 and reported to have breast cancer in the cancer regist

Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer: S
✍ Wick R. Williams; David E. Anderson; D. C. Rao 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 965 KB

An investigation of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer involving complex segregation analysis of 200 breast cancer pedigrees of Danish extraction is presented. The observed distribution of breast cancer is compatible with transmission of an autosomai-dominant gene with no evidence for residua

Oligogenic segregation analysis of hered
✍ Erin M. Conlon; Ellen L. Goode; Mark Gibbs; Janet L. Stanford; Michael Badzioch; 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 102 KB

## Abstract Previous studies have suggested strong evidence for a hereditary component to prostate cancer (PC) susceptibility. Here, we analyze 3,796 individuals in 263 PC families recruited as part of the ongoing Prostate Cancer Genetic Research Study (PROGRESS). We use Markov chain Monte Carlo (M

Analysis of breast cancer pedigrees usin
✍ Dr. Jennifer H. Barrett; Alan S. Rigby 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 279 KB

Haplotype-sharing was examined in sets of affected siblings in the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium pedigrees [Easton et al., 19931, using both identity-bydescent and identity-by-state methods. Linkage of the disease susceptibility locus to markers on chromosome 17 was confirmed. Substantial genetic

Segregation and linkage analysis of brea
✍ LA Cannon; DT Bishop; MH Skolnick 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 385 KB 👁 1 views

We perfom both segregation and linkage analysis for an hypothesized breast cmxr suscqt&ility gene u d e r a s w l e analyze these families, we present a breast cancer penetrance model a sirrgle parameter for each gemtype. lmis is in corrtrast to previms models that require two or more parameters for

Possible heterogeneity in the segregatio
✍ AM Goldstein; Dr. RWC Haile; SE Hodge; Ann Paganini-Hill; MA Spence; D. C. Rao 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 743 KB

We investigated the segregation pattern of breast cancer in families with bilateral breast cancer, classifying families with respect to menopausal status (premenopausal versus postmenopausal) and the interval between diagnosis of the two primary tumors in the probands. Probands were "synchronous" if