The average rate of growth during the ascending portion of the sunspot cycle, defined here as the difference in smoothed sunspot number values between elapsed time (in months) t and sunspot minimum divided by t, is shown to correlate (r > 0.78) with the size of the sunspot cycle, especially for t >
On the maximum rate of change in sunspot number growth and the size of the sunspot cycle
โ Scribed by Robert M. Wilson
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 387 KB
- Volume
- 127
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0038-0938
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Statistically significant correlations exist between the size (maximum amplitude) of the sunspot cycle and, especially, the maximum value of the rate of rise during the ascending portion of the sunspot cycle, where the rate of rise is computed either as the difference in the month-to-month smoothed sunspot number values or as the 'average rate of growth' in smoothed sunspot number from sunspot minimum. Based on the observed values of these quantities (equal to 10.6 and 4.63, respectively) as of early 1989, one infers that cycle 22's maximum amplitude will be about 175 + 30 or 185 + 10, respectively, where the error bars represent approximately twice the average error found during cycles 10-21 from the two fits.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Examined are associational aspects as they relate the maximum amplitude R M for the sunspot cycle to the rate of rise Ral during the ascending phase, where R M is the smoothed sunspot number at cycle maximum and Rat is the sum of the monthly mean sunspot numbers for selected 6-month intervals (At) m
The method proposed by Hathaway et al. [SoPh 151 (1994) 177] was employed to predict the magnitude of sunspot activities in the declining phase of solar Cycle 23, based on the monthly averages of sunspot number and the smoothed monthly averages of sunspot number, respectively. Our results show that: