Let D be a finite family of k-subsets (called blocks) of a v-set X(v). Then D is a (v, k, t) covering design or covering if every t-subset of X(v) is contained in at least one block of D. The number of blocks is the size of the covering, and the minimum size of the covering is called the covering nu
New upper bounds on the minimum size of covering designs
✍ Scribed by Iliya Bluskov; Heikki Hämäläinen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 310 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1063-8539
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Let D = {B1 , B2 , . . . , B b } be a finite family of k-subsets (called blocks) of a vset X(v) = {1, 2, . . . , v} (with elements called points). Then D is a (v, k, t) covering design or covering if every t-subset of X(v) is contained in at least one block of D. The number of blocks, b, is the size of the covering, and the minimum size of the covering is called the covering number, denoted C(v, k, t). This article is concerned with new constructions of coverings. The constructions improve many upper bounds on the covering number C(v, k, t)
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We give an exponential upper bound in p 4 on the size of any obstruction for path-width at most p. We give a doubly exponential upper bound in k 5 on the size of any obstruction for tree-width at most k. We also give an upper bound on the size of any intertwine of two given trees T and T $. The boun
## Abstract It is known that a planar graph on __n__ vertices has branch‐width/tree‐width bounded by $\alpha \sqrt {n}$. In many algorithmic applications, it is useful to have a small bound on the constant α. We give a proof of the best, so far, upper bound for the constant α. In particular, for th
We derive new upper bounds on the covering radius of a binary linear code as a function of its dual distance and dual-distance width . These bounds improve on the Delorme -Sole ´ -Stokes bounds , and in a certain interval for binary linear codes they are also better than Tieta ¨ va ¨ inen's bound .
## Abstract We produce in this paper an upper bound for the number of vertices existing in a clique of maximum cardinal. The proof is based in particular on the existence of a maximum cardinal clique that contains no vertex __x__ such that the neighborhood of __x__ is contained in the neighborhood