𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

New upper bounds on the decomposability of planar graphs

✍ Scribed by Fedor V. Fomin; Dimitrios M. Thilikos


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
335 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0364-9024

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

It is known that a planar graph on n vertices has branch‐width/tree‐width bounded by $\alpha \sqrt {n}$. In many algorithmic applications, it is useful to have a small bound on the constant Ξ±. We give a proof of the best, so far, upper bound for the constant Ξ±. In particular, for the case of tree‐width, α < 3.182 and for the case of branch‐width, α < 2.122. Our proof is based on the planar separation theorem of Alon, Seymour, and Thomas and some min–max theorems of Robertson and Seymour from the graph minors series. We also discuss some algorithmic consequences of this result. Β© 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A New Upper Bound on the Cheeger Number
✍ Sorin Dragomir; Elisabetta Barletta πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 117 KB

Using a technique developed by A. Nilli (1991, Discrete Math. 91, 207 210), we estimate from above the Cheeger number of a finite connected graph G of small degree (2(G) 5) admitting sufficiently distant edges. ## 2001 Academic Press Let G=(V(G), E(G)) be a finite connected graph. The Cheeger numb

The Order Upper Bound on Parity Embeddin
✍ Thomas Zaslavsky πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 398 KB

A graph 1 is parity embedded in a surface if a closed path in the graph is orientation preserving or reversing according to whether its length is even or odd. The parity demigenus of 1 is the minimum of 2&/(S) (where / is the Euler characteristic) over all surfaces S in which 1 can be parity embedde

New upper bounds on the minimum size of
✍ Iliya Bluskov; Heikki HΓ€mΓ€lΓ€inen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 310 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Let D = {B1 , B2 , . . . , B b } be a finite family of k-subsets (called blocks) of a vset X(v) = {1, 2, . . . , v} (with elements called points). Then D is a (v, k, t) covering design or covering if every t-subset of X(v) is contained in at least one block of D. The number of blocks, b, is the size