Let D = {B1 , B2 , . . . , B b } be a finite family of k-subsets (called blocks) of a vset X(v) = {1, 2, . . . , v} (with elements called points). Then D is a (v, k, t) covering design or covering if every t-subset of X(v) is contained in at least one block of D. The number of blocks, b, is the size
General Upper Bounds on the Minimum Size of Covering Designs
โ Scribed by Iliya Bluskov; Katherine Heinrich
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 105 KB
- Volume
- 86
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0097-3165
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Let D be a finite family of k-subsets (called blocks) of a v-set X(v). Then D is a (v, k, t) covering design or covering if every t-subset of X(v) is contained in at least one block of D. The number of blocks is the size of the covering, and the minimum size of the covering is called the covering number. In this paper we find new upper bounds on the covering numbers for several families of parameters.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A collection $\cal C$ of __k__โsubsets (called __blocks__) of a __v__โset __X__ (__v__)โ=โ{1, 2,โฆ, __v__} (with elements called __points__) is called a __t__โ(__v__, __k__, __m__, ฮป) __covering__ if for every __m__โsubset M of __X__ (__v__) there is a subcollection $\cal K$ of $\cal C$
We give an exponential upper bound in p 4 on the size of any obstruction for path-width at most p. We give a doubly exponential upper bound in k 5 on the size of any obstruction for tree-width at most k. We also give an upper bound on the size of any intertwine of two given trees T and T $. The boun
We derive new upper bounds on the covering radius of a binary linear code as a function of its dual distance and dual-distance width . These bounds improve on the Delorme -Sole ยด -Stokes bounds , and in a certain interval for binary linear codes they are also better than Tieta ยจ va ยจ inen's bound .
## Abstract We produce in this paper an upper bound for the number of vertices existing in a clique of maximum cardinal. The proof is based in particular on the existence of a maximum cardinal clique that contains no vertex __x__ such that the neighborhood of __x__ is contained in the neighborhood
## Abstract A graph is point determining if distinct vertices have distinct neighborhoods. The nucleus of a pointโdetermining graph is the set __G__^O^ of all vertices, __v__, such that __G__โ__v__ is point determining. In this paper we show that the size, ฯ(__G__), of a maximum clique in __G__ sat