✦ LIBER ✦

Justice Expectations and Applicant Perceptions

✍ Scribed by Bradford S. Bell; Ann Marie Ryan; Darin Wiechmann

Book ID: 110758302
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 164 KB
Volume: 12
Category: Article
ISSN: 0965-075X
DOI: 10.1111/j.0965-075x.2004.00261.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness:

Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness: Integrating Justice and Self-Serving Bias Perspectives

✍ David Chan; Neal Scmitt; Danielle Jennings; Catherine S. Clause; Kerry Delbridge 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB

Perceptions of Justice in Employment Sel

Perceptions of Justice in Employment Selection Decisions: The Role of Applicant Gender

✍ Jeremy B. Bernerth 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB

Differences in expectations and percepti

Differences in expectations and perceptions among criminal justice officials concerning boot camps

✍ Veneziano, Carol; Veneziano, Louis; Bourns, William; Fichter, Michael; Summers, 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group ⚖ 638 KB

Applicant pool composition and job perce

Applicant pool composition and job perceptions: Impact on decisions regarding an older applicant

✍ Jeanette N Cleveland; Ronald M Festa; Linda Montgomery 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 956 KB

Do Procedural Justice Perceptions in a S

Do Procedural Justice Perceptions in a Selection Testing Context Predict Applicant Attraction and Intention Toward the Organization?

✍ Carl P. Maertz Jr; Donald C. Mosley Jr.; Talya N. Bauer; Richard A. Posthuma; Mi 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 937 KB

Distributive justice and legitimate expe

Distributive justice and legitimate expectations

✍ Allen Buchanan 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 390 KB

Robert Nozick argues that Rawls's difference principle is liable to a fundamental instability. According to Nozick, an 'end-state' theory of distributive justice is any theory which holds that "the justice of a distribution is determined by how things are distributed (who has what) as judged by some