𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ionic liquid/ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

✍ Scribed by Ru-Song Zhao; Xia Wang; Fu-Wei Li; Shan-Shan Wang; Li-Li Zhang; Chuan-Ge Cheng


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
221 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
1615-9306

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In this article, a novel and simple microextraction method, termed ionic liquid/ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL/IL‐DLLME), has been designed and developed for the rapid enrichment and analysis of environmental pollutants. Instead of using hazardous organic solvents, two kinds of ILs, hydrophobic IL and hydrophilic IL, were used as extraction solvent and disperser solvent in IL/IL‐DLLME step, respectively. Permethrin and biphenthrin, two of the often‐used pyrethroid pesticides, were used as model compounds. Factors that may affect the enrichment efficiencies were investigated and optimized in detail. Under optimum conditions, permethrin and biphenthrin exhibited a wide linear relationship over the range 1–100 μg/L. For permethrin and biphenthrin, the precisions were 4.65–7.78%, and limits of detection were found to be 0.28 and 0.83 μg/L, respectively. Satisfactory results were achieved when the present method was applied to analyze the target compounds in real‐world water samples with spiked recoveries over the range 84.1–113.5%. All these facts indicated that IL/IL‐DLLME is a simple and rapid alternative for the enrichment and analysis of environmental pollutants and will have a wide application perspective in the future.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liq
✍ Dandan Han; Hongyuan Yan; Kyung H. Row 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 186 KB

## Abstract Ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was developed for the extraction and preconcentration of aromatic amine from environmental water. A suitable mixture of extraction solvent (100 μL, 1‐__butyl__‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophoshate) and dispersive solvent (750

Quantitation of antioxidants in water sa
✍ Hamid Reza Sobhi; Amir Kashtiaray; Hadi Farahani; Mohammad Reza Farahani 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 176 KB

## Abstract A simple and efficient method, ionic liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐ultraviolet detection (HPLC‐UV), has been applied for the extraction and determination of some antioxidants (Irganox 1010, Irganox 1076 and Irg

Orthogonal array design for the optimiza
✍ Lei Ye; Juanjuan Liu; Xin Yang; Yan Peng; Li Xu 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 190 KB

## Abstract In the present study, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) using an ionic liquid (IL) as the extractant was successfully developed to extract four benzophenone‐type UV filters from the different water matrices. Orthogonal array experimental design (OAD), based on five factor

Determination of insecticides in water u
✍ Songqing Li; Haixiang Gao; Jiaheng Zhang; Yubo Li; Bing Peng; Zhiqiang Zhou 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 220 KB

## Abstract A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method using __in situ__ halide exchange reaction to form ionic liquid (IL) extraction phase was developed to determine four insecticides (i.e. methoxyfenozide, tetrachlorvinphos, thiamethoxam, and diafenthiuron) in water samples. The p

Temperature-controlled ionic liquid-disp
✍ Qingxiang Zhou; Xiaoguo Zhang; Guohong Xie; Junping Xiao 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 239 KB

## Abstract This article describes a new, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of chlorotoluron, diethofencarb and chlorbenzuron from water samples with temperature‐controlled ionic liquid‐dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction. In the preconcentration procedure, ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3

Comparison of dispersive liquid–liquid m
✍ Jie Tian; Xuan Chen; Xiaohong Bai 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 199 KB

## Abstract In this paper, two methods based on organic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (OS‐DLLME) and ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography have been critically compared for analyzing emodin and its met