𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Orthogonal array design for the optimization of ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of benzophenone-type UV filters

✍ Scribed by Lei Ye; Juanjuan Liu; Xin Yang; Yan Peng; Li Xu


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
190 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
1615-9306

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In the present study, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) using an ionic liquid (IL) as the extractant was successfully developed to extract four benzophenone‐type UV filters from the different water matrices. Orthogonal array experimental design (OAD), based on five factors and four levels (L~16~(4^5^)), was employed to optimize IL‐dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure. The five factors included pH of sample solution, the volume of IL and methanol addition, extraction time and the amount of salt added. The optimal extraction condition was as follows. Sample solution was at a pH of 2.63 in the presence of 60 mg/mL sodium chloride; 30 μL IL and 15 μL methanol were used as extractant and disperser solvent, respectively; extraction was achieved by vortexing for 4 min. Using high‐performance liquid chromatography‐UV analysis, the limits of detection of the target analytes ranged between 1.9 and 6.4 ng/mL. The linear ranges were between 10 or 20 ng/mL and 1000 ng/mL. This procedure afforded a convenient, fast and cost‐saving operation with high extraction efficiency for the model analytes. Spiked waters from two rivers and one lake were examined by the developed method. For the swimming pool water, the standard addition method was employed to determine the actual concentrations of the UV filters.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of dispersive liquid–liquid m
✍ Jie Tian; Xuan Chen; Xiaohong Bai 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 199 KB

## Abstract In this paper, two methods based on organic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (OS‐DLLME) and ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL‐DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography have been critically compared for analyzing emodin and its met