๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Injectability evaluation of tricalcium phosphate bone cement

โœ Scribed by Hugo Leonardo Rocha Alves; Luis A. dos Santos; Carlos P. Bergmann


Publisher
Springer
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
265 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0957-4530

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Novel tricalcium silicate/monocalcium ph
โœ Zhiguang Huan; Jiang Chang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 372 KB

## Abstract In this paper, we obtained a novel bone cement composed of tricalcium silicate (Ca~3~SiO~5~; C~3~S) and monocalcium phosphate monohydrate (MCPM). The weight ratio of MCPM in the cement is 0, 10, 20, and 30%. The initial setting time was dramatically reduced from 90 min to 30 min as the

Cephalexin-loaded injectable macroporous
โœ Saeed Hesaraki; Roghayeh Nemati ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 774 KB

## Abstract Different types of calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) have been studied as potential matrices for incorporating different types of antibiotics. All of these matrices were morphologically microporous whereas macroporosity is essential for rapid cement resorption and bone replacement. In th

Novel bioactive composite bone cements b
โœ Zhiguang Huan; Jiang Chang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 688 KB

Bioactive composite bone cements were obtained by incorporation of tricalcium silicate (Ca 3 SiO 5 , C 3 S) into a brushite bone cement composed of b-tricalcium phosphate [b-Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , b-TCP] and monocalcium phosphate monohydrate [Ca(H 2 PO 4 ) 2 รH 2 O, MCPM], and the properties of the new ce

Bone bonding mechanism of ?-tricalcium p
โœ Kotani, S. ;Fujita, Y. ;Kitsugi, T. ;Nakamura, T. ;Yamamuro, T. ;Ohtsuki, C. ;Ko ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 791 KB

It has been proposed that the formation of a surface apatite layer in vivo on surface active ceramics is an essential condition for chemical bonding between ceramics and bone tissue. To clarify the difference in bone-bonding mechanisms between surface active ceramics and bioresorbable ceramics, two