𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

In vivo biocompatibility and biostability of modified polyurethanes

✍ Scribed by Mathur, Anshu B. ;Collier, Terry O. ;Kao, W. John ;Wiggins, Michael ;Schubert, Mark A. ;Hiltner, Anne ;Anderson, James M.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
729 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Modified segmented polyurethanes were examined for biostability and biocompatibility using an in vivo cage implant system for time intervals of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 weeks. Two types of materials were used: polyether polyurethanes and polycarbonate polyurethanes. Two unmodified polyether polyurethanes (PEUU A' and SPU-PRM), one PDMS endcapped polyether polyurethane (SPU-S), and two polycarbonate polyurethanes (SPU-PCU and SPU-C) were investigated in this study. Techniques used to characterize untreated materials were dynamic water contact angle, stress-strain analysis, and gel permeation chromatography. Cellular response was measured by exudate analysis and by macrophage and foreign body giant cell (FBGC) densities. Material characterization, postimplantation, was done by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) in order to quantify biodegradation and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to qualitatively describe the cellular response and biodegradation. The exudate analysis showed that the acute and chronic inflammatory responses for all materials were similar. Lower FBGC densities and cell coverage on SPU-S were attributed to the hydrophobic surface provided by the PDMS endgroups. The polycarbonate polyurethanes did not show any significant differences in cell coverage or FBGC densities even though the macrophage densities were slightly lower compared to polyether polyurethanes. By 10 weeks, biodegradation in the case of PEUU A' and SPU-PRM was extensive as compared to SPU-S because the PDMS endcaps of SPU-S provided a shield against the oxygen radicals secreted by macrophages and FBGCs and lowered the rate of biodegradation. In the case of polycarbonate polyurethanes, the oxidative stability of the carbonate linkage lowered the rate of biodegradation tremendously as compared to the polyether polyurethanes (including SPU-S). The minor amount of biodegradation seen in polycarbonate polyurethanes at 10 weeks was attributed to hydrolysis of the carbonate linkage.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


In vivo biostability of shore 55D polyet
✍ Robert Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 502 KB

## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to autooxidation and environmental stress cracking (ESC) because of interactions with lysosomal oxygen‐free radicals. Oxidation can also be catalyzed by and caused by direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (metal ion oxidation, MIO). The s

In vivo kinetic degradation analysis and
✍ Pamela T. Knight; James T. Kirk; James M. Anderson; Patrick T. Mather πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 674 KB

## Abstract Polyester polyurethanes incorporating polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane (POSS) as the crystalline hard block were evaluated for biocompatibility and degradation over 24 weeks __in vivo__. __In vitro__ studies were also used to predict the onset of mass loss. The molecular weight of each sa

In vivo biostability of polysiloxane pol
✍ Bob Ward; James Anderson; Mike Ebert; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 597 KB

## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to oxidation catalyzed by and through direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (cobalt), released by corrosion of metallic parts in an implanted device. Replacing part of the polyether with polysiloxane appears to reduce susceptibility to me

In vivo biostability of polyether polyur
✍ Bob Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 535 KB

## Abstract A series of Shore 80A polyether polyurethanes were synthesized with from 0 to 6% fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups (SME) to provide the bulk properties of the polyurethane with the surface properties of the fluoropolymer. It was theorized that the fluoropolymer would migrate to

In vivo biostability of polysiloxane pol
✍ Robert Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 539 KB

## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are extremely interesting for use in implantable devices. They are, however, susceptible to autoxidative degradation and stress cracking. One approach to improving biostability is to replace some of the polyether with polysiloxane. Shore 80A polyether polyurethan

In vivo biostability of polyether polyur
✍ Robert Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 465 KB

## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to oxidation catalyzed by, and through direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (metal ion oxidation, MIO). The source of the ions is corrosion of metallic parts within an implanted device. A Shore 80A polyether polyurethane was modified wit