๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

In vivo kinetic degradation analysis and biocompatibility of aliphatic polyester polyurethanes

โœ Scribed by Pamela T. Knight; James T. Kirk; James M. Anderson; Patrick T. Mather


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
674 KB
Volume
94A
Category
Article
ISSN
1549-3296

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Polyester polyurethanes incorporating polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane (POSS) as the crystalline hard block were evaluated for biocompatibility and degradation over 24 weeks in vivo. In vitro studies were also used to predict the onset of mass loss. The molecular weight of each sample was found to decrease quickly over an 8 week period and then became constant due to the nondegrading POSS hard block. Kinetic analysis of the initial molecular weight change indicated that the degradation rate was dependant on the soft block composition. Crystallinity, melting temperature, and heat of fusion of the polyurethanes were found to increase during degradation as the amorphous polyester soft segments were hydrolyzed. The histological analysis of each polymer demonstrated rapid resolution of the acute and chronic inflammatory responses and the development of expected, normal foreign body reaction, consisting of adherent macrophages and foreign body giant cells on the surface of the polymers, and fibrous capsule formation around the polymer. No acute and/or chronic inflammation was seen after 3 weeks, indicating that the polymers in film form and biodegraded form, that is, particles, were biocompatible and did not elicit inflammatory responses expected for toxic or nonbiocompatible materials. ยฉ 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2010.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


In vivo biocompatibility of an aliphatic
โœ Jayabalan, M. ;Shunmuga Kumar, N. ;Rathinam, K. ;Kumari, T. V. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 661 KB

A cage implantation technique has been a d o p t e d i n a rabbit animal model t o investigate the biocompatibility of a n aliphatic crosslinked polyurethane based on hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI). In this study, four cages are represented; the cage containing t h e candidate polyu r e t h a n e

In vivo biocompatibility and biostabilit
โœ Mathur, Anshu B. ;Collier, Terry O. ;Kao, W. John ;Wiggins, Michael ;Schubert, M ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 729 KB

Modified segmented polyurethanes were examined for biostability and biocompatibility using an in vivo cage implant system for time intervals of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 weeks. Two types of materials were used: polyether polyurethanes and polycarbonate polyurethanes. Two unmodified polyether polyurethanes

Biocompatibility and degradation of alip
โœ Priscilla A. M. Lips; Marja J. A. van Luyn; Federica Chiellini; Linda A. Brouwer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 410 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Aliphatic segmented poly(ester amide)s, comprising a crystallizable amide phase and a flexible amorphous ester phase, were investigated for potential use in biomedical applications. By varying the amide content and the type of crystallizable amide segments, the polymer's thermal and mec