## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to oxidation catalyzed by, and through direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (metal ion oxidation, MIO). The source of the ions is corrosion of metallic parts within an implanted device. A Shore 80A polyether polyurethane was modified wit
In vivo biostability of polyether polyurethanes with fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups: Resistance to biologic oxidation and stress cracking
✍ Scribed by Bob Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 535 KB
- Volume
- 79A
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1549-3296
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A series of Shore 80A polyether polyurethanes were synthesized with from 0 to 6% fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups (SME) to provide the bulk properties of the polyurethane with the surface properties of the fluoropolymer. It was theorized that the fluoropolymer would migrate to the surface, forming a monolayer barrier to the oxidants and crack‐driving agents released by macrophages and foreign body giant cells in vivo. In a 12‐week biostability screening test, samples strained to 400% elongation appeared to be highly stable. In a longer‐term study, the fluoropolymer SME significantly delayed, but did not completely prevent the onset of microcracking and the development of environmental stress cracking in strained samples. Even so, the 4 and 6% SME polymers explanted at 2 years performed significantly better than the control. FTIR analysis did not correlate with SME concentration, but increased hydrogen‐bonding index and loss of aliphatic ether (autoxidation) did correlate with the visual appearance and density of microcracks. Significant molecular weight reductions were seen for the SME‐free control, but were small (within instrumental error) for the polymers with SME. The use of fluoropolymer as a SME does appear to be warranted as a means to improve polyether polyurethane biostability. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are extremely interesting for use in implantable devices. They are, however, susceptible to autoxidative degradation and stress cracking. One approach to improving biostability is to replace some of the polyether with polysiloxane. Shore 80A polyether polyurethan
## Abstract Polyethylene oxide (PEO) on polymer surfaces has been reported to reduce cellular adhesion, a very desirable property for cardiac pacing leads. A Shore 80A polyether polyurethane with up to 6% PEO surface‐modifying end groups (SME) was evaluated for its chronic __in vivo__ biostability.
## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to autooxidation and environmental stress cracking (ESC) because of interactions with lysosomal oxygen‐free radicals. Oxidation can also be catalyzed by and caused by direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (metal ion oxidation, MIO). The s
## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to oxidation catalyzed by and through direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (cobalt), released by corrosion of metallic parts in an implanted device. Replacing part of the polyether with polysiloxane appears to reduce susceptibility to me