𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

In vivo biostability of shore 55D polyether polyurethanes with and without fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups

✍ Scribed by Robert Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
502 KB
Volume
79A
Category
Article
ISSN
1549-3296

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Polyether polyurethanes are subject to autooxidation and environmental stress cracking (ESC) because of interactions with lysosomal oxygen‐free radicals. Oxidation can also be catalyzed by and caused by direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (metal ion oxidation, MIO). The source of the ions is corrosion of metallic parts within an implanted device. A previous study on a Shore 80A polyether polyurethane modified with fluoropolymer surface modifying end groups demonstrated improved biostability over unmodified controls. We predicted that this could be extrapolated to the inherently more biostable Shore 55D version (E55DF). While it is difficult to demonstrate significant biodegradation in the harder polymers within a reasonable time frame, we did see excellent biologic autooxidation and ESC resistance for both E55DF and its unmodified Shore 55D (P55D) control. E55DF was slightly, but significantly more resistant to MIO than P55D. This was particularly evident in molecular weight distributions with P55D exhibiting a large decrease in number average molecular weight compared to no change for E55DF. Both were markedly superior to the softer Shore 80A control. It does appear that one can extrapolate accelerated in vivo biostability results with the softer polymers to their harder analogues. Β© 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


In vivo biostability of polyether polyur
✍ Bob Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 535 KB

## Abstract A series of Shore 80A polyether polyurethanes were synthesized with from 0 to 6% fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups (SME) to provide the bulk properties of the polyurethane with the surface properties of the fluoropolymer. It was theorized that the fluoropolymer would migrate to

In vivo biostability of polyether polyur
✍ Robert Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 465 KB

## Abstract Polyether polyurethanes are subject to oxidation catalyzed by, and through direct (redox) reaction with transition metal ions (metal ion oxidation, MIO). The source of the ions is corrosion of metallic parts within an implanted device. A Shore 80A polyether polyurethane was modified wit

In vivo biostability of polyether polyur
✍ Mike Ebert; Bob Ward; James Anderson; Rick McVenes; Ken Stokes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 364 KB

## Abstract Polyethylene oxide (PEO) on polymer surfaces has been reported to reduce cellular adhesion, a very desirable property for cardiac pacing leads. A Shore 80A polyether polyurethane with up to 6% PEO surface‐modifying end groups (SME) was evaluated for its chronic __in vivo__ biostability.