𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Faculty productivity and the complexity of student exam questions

✍ Scribed by Robert M. Johnson Jr.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Weight
457 KB
Volume
1996
Category
Article
ISSN
0271-0579

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The relationship between faculty publication productivity and the cognitive complexity of student examination questions is examined. Results show that scholars who publish books and those who publish fewer articles ask more critical-thinking questions. Publishing more articles seems to negatively influence the asking of such questions.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The Role of the Dean in Strengthening Fa
✍ Rino J. Patti πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 51 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

To publish or perish has as much to do with a faculty member's research and teaching abilities as it does with a professional school dean's ability to advocate for the unique knowledge-building activities of a profession.

Effectively involving faculty in the ass
✍ Thomas F. Nelson Laird; Robert Smallwood; Amanda Suniti NiskodΓ©-Dossett; Amy K. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 67 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract This chapter discusses four rolesβ€”source of data, audience, data analyst, and beneficiary of assessment knowledgeβ€”faculty can play in the assessment of student engagement on college and university campuses.

Predicting early career research product
✍ Ian O. Williamson; Daniel M. Cable πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 147 KB

## Abstract We used a longitudinal design to examine the predictors of early career research productivity for 152 management professors over the first six years of their career. Results revealed early career research productivity to be a function of dissertation advisor research productivity, pre‐a

A developmental typology of faculty-stud
✍ Bradley E. Cox πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 134 KB

## Abstract This chapter presents a typology of faculty‐student interaction outside the classroom. As both a descriptive framework and a developmental model, the typology can be used independently or to augment traditional survey research. The chapter concludes with five lessons learned about facul