## Abstract In 24 patients presenting with 55 renal lesions (mean size, 20.8 mm), single‐breath‐hold (SBH) fast spin‐echo (FSE) techniques allowing T1 and T2 images to be produced within 20 and 23 sec, respectively, were compared with routine non‐breath‐hold (NBH) spin‐echo (SE) T1 and NBH‐FSE T2 s
Echo-train STIR MRI of the liver: Comparison of breath-hold and non-breath-hold imaging strategies
✍ Scribed by James P. Earls; Neil M. Rofsky; Douglas R. DeCorato; Glenn A. Krinsky; Jeffrey C. Weinreb
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 279 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract To compare liver lesion detection rates, tissue signal and noise data, and qualitative parameters for breathhold (BH) and non‐breath‐hold (NBH) hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and conventional spin‐echo (CSE) T2‐weighted (CSE‐T2) MR sequences, 20 patients wer
## Abstract The purpose of our study was to compare the value of respiratory‐triggered fast spin‐echo, breath‐hold single‐shot fast spin‐echo, and breath‐hold fast‐recovery fast spin‐echo sequences in detecting hepatic lesions. Fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained with
## Abstract Three rapid T1‐weighted gradient‐echo techniques for imaging of the liver were compared: fast low‐angle shot (FLASH) and section‐selective (SSTF) and non‐section‐selective (NSTF) inversion‐recovery TurboFLASH. Ten healthy volunteers were imaged at 1.5 T, with breath‐hold images acquired
## Abstract In 49 patients who had pelvic abnormalities, breath‐hold T2‐weighted fast‐recovery (FR)‐fast spin‐echo (FSE) (imaging time = 24 sec) and nonbreath‐hold FSE MR images (2 min 8 sec) were compared qualitatively (on a four‐point scale) and quantitatively (using signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs)