## Abstract In 49 patients who had pelvic abnormalities, breath‐hold T2‐weighted fast‐recovery (FR)‐fast spin‐echo (FSE) (imaging time = 24 sec) and nonbreath‐hold FSE MR images (2 min 8 sec) were compared qualitatively (on a four‐point scale) and quantitatively (using signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs)
T2-weighted MRI of the uterus: Fast spin echo vs. breath-hold fast spin echo
✍ Scribed by Susan M. Ascher; Janice O'Malley; Richard C. Semelka; Richard H. Patt; Sunder Rajan; David Thomasson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 332 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the abilities of T2‐weighted (T2W) imaging using respiratory‐triggered fast spin‐echo (RT‐FSE), breathhold fast‐recovery FSE (BH‐FRFSE), and BH single‐shot FSE (BH‐SSFSE) sequences without an endorectal coil to detect rectosigmoid carcinomas. ## Materials and Met
## Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of T2‐weighted fast‐spin‐echo (FSE) and intermediate‐weighted spin‐echo (SE) MR imaging in the detection of meniscal tears. Seventy‐six patients (152 menisci) who had arthroscopic surgery after MR imaging of the knee were studied.
## Abstract Previously published fast spin‐echo (FSE) implementations of a Dixon method for water and fat separation all require multiple scans and thus a relatively long scan time. Further, the minimum echo spacing (esp), a time critical for FSE image quality and scan efficiency, often needs to be