𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

✍ Scribed by Brian M. Dale; John A. Jesberger; Jonathan S. Lewin; Claudia M. Hillenbrand; Jeffrey L. Duerk


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
328 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To examine the sensitivity of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) perfusion maps to errors in the various source images and to determine optimal imaging parameters for reducing this sensitivity.

Materials and Methods

A detailed analysis of the precision of a DCE‐MRI protocol was performed using the “propagation of errors” technique to investigate the effect of errors in the source images on errors in K^trans^. Optimal parameter values and interactions between parameters were examined. The propagation of errors analysis was validated by Monte‐Carlo simulations.

Results

The precision of K^trans^ was found to be most sensitive to artifacts in the tissue portion of the baseline images and least sensitive to noise in the arterial portion of the dynamic images. The tip‐angle strongly affected the precision, with the optimum being a function of tissue T1~0~.

Conclusion

Protocol optimization requires matching the tip‐angle to the anticipated T1~0~ of the tissue of interest; however such optimization yields a relatively small improvement. Future developmental efforts would be most productively focused on minimizing the artifact level. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;18:575–584. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Precision in measurements of perfusion a
✍ Lucy E. Kershaw; David L. Buckley 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 286 KB

## Abstract Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI is used to estimate microvascular parameters by tracer kinetics analysis. The time for the contrast agent to travel from the artery to the tissue of interest (bolus arrival time (BAT)) is an important parameter that must be measured in such studies because

On the theoretical basis of perfusion me
✍ V.G. Kiselev 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

## Abstract A quantitative analysis was undertaken to calibrate the perfusion quantification technique based on tracking the first pass of a bolus of a blood pool contrast agent. A complete simulation of the bolus passage, of the associated changes in the __T__~2~ and __T__ signals, and of the data

Method for the quantitative assessment o
✍ Karl Hittmair; Gregor Gomiscek; Karl Langenberger; Michael Recht; Herwig Imhof; 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 499 KB

## Abstract In previous papers relative signal intensity increase was used as a quantitative assessment parameter for contrast uptake in contrastenhanced MRI. However, relative signal intensity increase does not only reflect contrast uptake but depends also on tissue parameters (native __T__~1~ rel

Quantification of the effect of water ex
✍ Henrik B.W. Larsson; Sverre Rosenbaum; Thomas Fritz-Hansen 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 279 KB

## Abstract Measurement of myocardial and brain perfusion when using exogenous contrast agents (CAs) such as gadolinium‐DTPA (Gd‐DTPA) and MRI is affected by the diffusion of water between compartments. This water exchange may have an impact on signal enhancement, or, equivalently, on the longitudi