## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the differences in enhancement of the abdominal solid organ and the major vessel on dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) obtained with gadolinium ethoxybenzyldiethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd‐EOB‐DTPA: EOB) and gadolinium diethylen
Comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of liver tumors
✍ Scribed by Olivier Clemént; Andreas Mühler; Vladimir S. Vexler; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Yves Berthezéne; Werner Rosenau; Robert C. Brasch
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 707 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A new hepatobiliary contrast agent for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, gadolinium‐ethoxybenzy1 (EOB)‐diethylemetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), was compared with Gd‐DTPA to define the potential for improving tumor‐liver contrast in a rodent liver adenocarcinoma model. With a T1‐weighted spin‐echo sequence, the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (C/N) for tumor before contrast agent administration was 5 (arbitrary units), the tumor appearing slightly hypo‐intense with respect to liver parenchyma. After Gd‐DTPA injection (0.1 mmol/kg), tumor enhanced more strongly than liver, resulting in an equalization of tumor and liver signal intensities and a decline in C/N to zero at 3 minutes after injection. After Gd‐EOB‐DTPA injection (0.1 mmol/kg), liver enhanced more strongly than tumor. Five minutes after injection, C/N increased from 5 to 25 and remained above 17 for 50 minutes. The data indicate that Gd‐EOB‐DTPA yields higher and more prolonged tumor‐liver contrast than Gd‐DTPA on T1‐weighted spin‐echo images. The high liver‐tumor contrast after Gd‐EOB‐DTPA administration should prove clinically advantageous for MR imaging detection of focal hepatic masses.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose: To determine histological and MR imaging differences between areas with Gd‐EOB‐DTPA (gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid) uptake and without in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) as seen on Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced hepatobiliary‐phase MR images. ## Materi
## Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of gd-dtpa-dea as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for mr imaging in comparison with those of gd-eob-dtpa. ## Materials and methods: We undertook phantom experiments to assess t1 relaxivity for gd-dtpa-dea, gd-eob-dtpa, and gd-dtpa in human plasma. for
## Abstract The microcirculation and oxygenation of a tumor play important roles in its responsiveness to cytotoxic treatment, and noninvasive assessments of its vascular properties may have prognostic value. Dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) ^1^H MRI based on infusion of Gd‐DTPA, and blood oxygen le
The NMR relaxivities of GQEOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA were determined in the kidney and liver of intact male W&tar rats immediately following sacrifice and in vitro in solutions and gels, at 1.5 T using a clinical MR scanner. Tl and T2 values of tissue samples were derived from spin-echo image sequences. T
## Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the new liver‐specific magnetic resonance contrast agent gadolinium‐ethoxybenzyl‐diethylenetriamine penta‐acetic acid (Gd‐EOB‐DTPA) to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Seventeen mice with 66 chemically induced HCCs underwent