Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the differences in enhancement of the abdominal solid organ and the major vessel on dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) obtained with gadolinium ethoxybenzyldiethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd‐EOB‐DTPA: EOB) and gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd‐DTPA) in the same patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 13 healthy volunteers underwent repeat assessments of abdominal MR examinations with DCE‐MRI using either Gd‐DTPA at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight or EOB at a dose of 0.025 mmol/kg body weight. DCE images were obtained at precontrast injection and in the arterial phase (AP: 25 seconds), portal phase (PP: 70 seconds), and equilibrium phase (EP: 3 minutes). The signal intensities (SIs) of liver at AP, PP, and EP; the SIs of spleen, renal cortex, renal medulla, pancreas, adrenal gland, aorta at AP; and the SIs of portal vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) at PP were defined using region‐of‐interest measurements, and were used for calculation of signal intensity ratio (SIR).
Results
The mean SIRs of liver (0.195 ± 0.140), spleen (1.35 ± 0.353), renal cortex (1.58 ± 0.517), renal medulla (0.548 ± 0.259), pancreas (0.540 ± 0.183), adrenal gland (1.04 ± 0.405), and aorta (2.44 ± 0.648) at AP as well as the mean SIRs of portal vein (1.85 ± 0.477) and IVC (1.16 ± 0.187) at PP in the EOB images were significantly lower than those (0.337 ± 0.200, 1.99 ± 0.443, 2.01 ± 0.474, 0.742 ± 0.336, 0.771 ± 0.227, 1.26 ± 0.442, 3.22 ± 1.20, 2.73 ± 0.429, and 1.68 ± 0.366, respectively) in the Gd‐DTPA images (P < 0.05 each). There was no significant difference in mean SIR of liver at PP between EOB (0.529 ± 0.124) and Gd‐DTPA (0.564 ± 0.139). Conversely, the mean SIR of liver at EP was significantly higher with EOB (0.576 ± 0.167) than with Gd‐DTPA (0.396 ± 0.093) (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Lower arterial vascular and parenchymal enhancement with Gd‐EOB, as compared with Gd‐DTPA, may require reassessment of its dose, despite the higher late venous phase liver parenchymal enhancement. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:636–640. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.