๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Phantom and animal studies of a new hepatobiliary agent for MR imaging: Comparison of Gd-DTPA-DeA with Gd-EOB-DTPA

โœ Scribed by Kohki Yoshikawa; Yusuke Inoue; Masaaki Akahane; Morio Shimada; Sayaka Itoh; Atsushi Seno; Sanshin Hayashi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
395 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Purpose:

To investigate the characteristics of gd-dtpa-dea as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for mr imaging in comparison with those of gd-eob-dtpa.

Materials and methods:

We undertook phantom experiments to assess t1 relaxivity for gd-dtpa-dea, gd-eob-dtpa, and gd-dtpa in human plasma. for gd-dtpa-dea and gd-eob-dtpa, we evaluated the contrast effect in rats using an spgr sequence. the contrast ratios of liver and abdominal aorta were measured up to 21 minutes after intravenous administration of the agents. visualization of the bile duct and renal pelvis was also assessed.

Results:

In human plasma, t1 relaxivity was similar for gd-dtpa-dea and gd-eob-dtpa, and higher than those for gd-dtpa. whereas the contrast ratio of liver peaked about five minutes after the injection of gd-eob-dtpa and was followed by a subsequent decline, a continuous rise was shown for gd-dtpa-dea, resulting in a larger maximal contrast effect. contrast ratios of the abdominal aorta were larger for gd-dtpa-dea. biliary excretion was observed for both agents but occurred earlier with gd-eob-dtpa. while renal excretion was shown for all rats three minutes after the injection of gd-eob-dtpa, it was not observed for gd-dtpa-dea.

Conclusion:

Gd-dtpa-dea may be used as a hepatobiliary contrast agent and shows different pharmacokinetics from gd-eob-dtpa.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of Gd [DTPA-bis (2-aminoethox
โœ Zhengyang Zhou; Jian Guo; Haiping Yu; Bin Zhu; Changjian Liu; Xiqun Jiang; Ming ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 430 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the differences between macromolecular and small molecular contrast agents in interstitial magnetic resonance (MR) lymphography. ## Materials and Methods In two groups of rabbits (__N__ = 12 each), 0.5โ€mL volumes of 0.5 M and 0.1 M gadodiamide, respectively, wer