Randomized trials are effective and usually unbiased for showing the average results in a selected outcome variable for treatment A versus treatment B, and meta-analyses produce an average of these averages. The results of both the trials and meta-analyses are often pragmatically unsatisfactory, how
Commentary on meta-analysis in clinical trials
β Scribed by Jesse Berlin; Thomas C. Chalmers
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 266 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The randomized clinical trial is the gold standard methodology for evaluating treatment interventions. The randomized trial is a prospective experimental study, the embodiment of the scientific method applied to the clinic. Both organizational and ethical considerations encourage the use of formal c
Results from external studies often play an important role in many aspects of a clinical trial. Their incorporation into the decision making process of a trial, however, is rarely conducted in a formal manner. This conference will address what formal role, if any, meta-analytic summaries of external
Service on the Data Monitoring Committee of the CPEP (Calcium for Pre-eclampsia Prevention) has led us to four conclusions about clinical trials which we should like to present to this gathering of biostatisticians for their reactions: (i) meta-analyses of the pertinent published trials of the same