Regardless of whether a statistician believes in letting a data set speak for itself through nominal p-values or believes in strict alpha conservation, the interpretation of experiments which are negative for the primary endpoint but positive for secondary endpoints is the source of some angst. The
✦ LIBER ✦
Commentary on ‘Alpha calculus in clinical trials: considerations and commentary for the new millennium’
✍ Scribed by Robert T. O'Neill
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 73 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Alpha calculus in clinical trials: consi
✍
Lemuel A. Moyé
📂
Article
📅
2000
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 103 KB
👁 1 views
Discussion for ‘Alpha calculus in clinic
✍
Gary G. Koch
📂
Article
📅
2000
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 43 KB
👁 1 views
The paper by Moyà e [1] provides useful discussion for some important statistical issues concerning the possibly complicated ways in which multiple comparisons across primary and secondary endpoints can a ect the results from clinical trials. How to balance tolerable in ation of type I error against
Response to commentaries on ‘Alpha calcu
✍
Lemuel A. Moyé
📂
Article
📅
2000
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 47 KB
👁 2 views
Commentary on Robin'sa smile, and the ne
✍
Resta, Robert G. ;Kessler, Seymour
📂
Article
📅
2004
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 33 KB