๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma with BRAF V600 Mutations

โœ Scribed by Flaherty, Keith T.; Infante, Jeffery R.; Daud, Adil; Gonzalez, Rene; Kefford, Richard F.; Sosman, Jeffrey; Hamid, Omid; Schuchter, Lynn; Cebon, Jonathan; Ibrahim, Nageatte; Kudchadkar, Ragini; Burris, Howard A.; Falchook, Gerald; Algazi, Alain; Lewis, Karl; Long, Georgina V.; Puzanov, Igor; Lebowitz, Peter; Singh, Ajay; Little, Shonda; Sun, Peng; Allred, Alicia; Ouellet, Daniele; Kim, Kevin B.; Patel, Kiran; Weber, Jeffrey


Book ID
118256723
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
528 KB
Volume
367
Category
Article
ISSN
0096-6762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Background

Resistance to therapy with BRAF kinase inhibitors is associated with reactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. To address this problem, we conducted a phase 1 and 2 trial of combined treatment with da braf e nib, a selective BRAF inhibitor, and trametinib, a selective MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitor.

Methods

In this open-label study involving 247 patients with metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600 mutations, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic activity and safety of oral dabraf e nib (75 or 150 mg twice daily) and tra me ti nib (1, 1.5, or 2 mg daily) in 85 patients and then randomly assigned 162 patients to receive combination therapy with da braf e nib (150 mg) plus tra me ti nib (1 or 2 mg) or da braf e nib monotherapy. The primary end points were the incidence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, survival free of melanoma progression, and response. Secondary end points were overall survival and pharmacokinetic activity.

Results

Dose-limiting toxic effects were infrequently observed in patients receiving combination therapy with 150 mg of da braf e nib and 2 mg of tra me ti nib (combination 150/2). Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was seen in 7% of patients receiving combination 150/2 and in 19% receiving monotherapy (P = 0.09), whereas pyrexia was more common in the combination 150/2 group than in the monotherapy group (71% vs. 26%). Median progression-free survival in the combination 150/2 group was 9.4 months, as compared with 5.8 months in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.62; P<0.001). The rate of complete or partial response with combination 150/2 therapy was 76%, as compared with 54% with monotherapy (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Da braf e nib and tra me ti nib were safely combined at full monotherapy doses. The rate of pyrexia was increased with combination therapy, whereas the rate of proliferative skin lesions was nonsignificantly reduced. Progression-free survival was significantly improved. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01072175.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Meta
โœ Qu, Kevin; Pan, Qiulu; Zhang, Xi; Rodriguez, Luis; Zhang, Ke; Li, Hairong; Ho, A ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2013 ๐Ÿ› American Society for Investigative Pathology ๐ŸŒ English โš– 527 KB