𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A Phase II trial of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with refractory metastatic breast carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Amy D. Tiersten; Caron Nelsen; Susan Talbot; Linda Vahdat; Robert Fine; Andrea Troxel; Lois Brafman; Laureen Shriberg; Karen Antman; Daniel P. Petrylak


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
86 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The similarity between the mechanism of action between docetaxel and estramustine generated the hypothesis of synergistic antimicrotubule effects and cytotoxicity when the two agents are combined. In addition, it has been demonstrated that estramustine binds P‐glycoprotein in vitro and, thus, may prevent the efflux of taxanes in tumors that over‐express P‐glycoprotein. To further evaluate the combinations clinical efficacy and safety, a trial was performed in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC).

METHODS

Thirty‐six patients with MBC were treated with estramustine 900 mg/m^2^ per day divided into 3 doses given on Days 1–3 and docetaxel 70 mg/m^2^ given by intravenous administration over 1 hour on Day 3 after the first dose of estramustine, every 21 days. Patients may have received any number of prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC.

RESULTS

Nine partial responses were observed in 31 assessable patients, for an objective response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval, 14–48%). The median progression free survival was 4 months (range, 1–41 months), and the median overall survival was 17 months (range, 2–45 months). Severe toxicities (Grade 3 or 4) were neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, and thrombosis. Seventy‐five percent of patients experienced either an improvement or no change in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and estramustine produced responses in heavily pretreated women with MBC while maintaining quality of life. Cancer 2003;97:537–44. Β© 2003 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.11082


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Oral estramustine and cyclophosphamide i
✍ Sergio Bracarda; Maurizio Tonato; Paolo Rosi; Verena De Angelis; Ettore Mearini; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 82 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. Nearly all cases of metastatic prostate carcinoma progress, after hormonal ablation, to a hormone refractory status. To the authors' knowledge no standard chemotherapy for patients with hormone refractory prostate carcinoma (HRPC) exists. In a prospective study, the efficacy and toxi

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, estramusti
✍ David C. Smith; Christopher H. Chay; Rodney L. Dunn; Jude Fardig; Peg Esper; Kar πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 127 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Preclinical data suggest that the combination of intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel, carboplatin, oral etoposide, and oral estramustine (TEEC) has significant activity in patients with advanced, hormone‐refractory prostate carcinoma. The authors conducted this clinical trial t

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and ge
✍ Tarek Mekhail; Thomas E. Hutson; Paul Elson; G. Thomas Budd; Gordon Srkalovic; T πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 97 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination. ## METHODS Docetaxel and gem