𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Oral estramustine and cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate carcinoma : A phase II study

✍ Scribed by Sergio Bracarda; Maurizio Tonato; Paolo Rosi; Verena De Angelis; Ettore Mearini; Stefano Cesaroni; Pierfrancesco Fornetti; Massimo Porena


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
82 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


BACKGROUND.

Nearly all cases of metastatic prostate carcinoma progress, after hormonal ablation, to a hormone refractory status. To the authors' knowledge no standard chemotherapy for patients with hormone refractory prostate carcinoma (HRPC) exists. In a prospective study, the efficacy and toxicity of an oral combination of estramustine and cyclophosphamide were evaluated. Between March 1996 and April 1998, 32 consecutive patients (median age 74 years; range, 53-84 years) with metastatic HRPC were treated with oral estramustine (10 mg/kg/day) and oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for 14 days every 28 days. Inclusion criteria were previous complete androgen blockade, antiandrogen withdrawal evaluation, and clinical or biochemical disease progression. Response assessment was based on a decrease Υ† 50% in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) level associated with improvement (or no worsening) in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) and relief of bone pain (if present).

METHODS.

RESULTS.

All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. PSA levels decreased by at least 50% in 14 patients (43.7%) (95% confidence interval, 26.5-60.9), remained stable in 12 patients (37.5%), and rose in 6 patients (18.8%). ECOG PS was 0 in 5 of 14 patients, improved from 1 to 0 in 7 patients, and remained unchanged in 2 patients. Bone pain, present in 8 of 14 patients, disappeared in 7 and was partially relieved in 1. The median duration of response was 30 weeks (range, 8 -88Ο© weeks). An objective partial response was obtained in two cases. Toxicity was mild and mainly gastrointestinal (World Health Organization [WHO] Grade 1).

No cases of WHO Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred.

CONCLUSIONS.

The oral combination of estramustine and cyclophosphamide appears to be safe and effective in patients with HRPC. In responding patients its use shows a clinical benefit in terms of improvement of ECOG PS and pain control.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Phase II study of the oral cyclophospham
✍ Catherine Maulard-Durdux; Bertrand Dufour; Christophe Hennequin; Y. ChrΓ©tien; Sy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 413 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. Hormonotherapy temporarily controls symptoms in 80% of patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. Once progression occurs, no consensus exists on further therapy. Oral etoposide (vp-16) has shown clinical efficacy in advanced small cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, germ cell tum

A Phase II study of oral idarubicin as a
✍ Hans-Peter Schmid; Rudolf Maibach; Juerg Bernhard; Franz Hering; Silvia Hanselma πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 108 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: Treatment of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma with chemotherapy is purely palliative, and reported response rates have been low. at the time this study was conducted, there was an urgent need for a trial using potentially efficacious drugs, with quality of life (ql), and serial

Chemotherapy in patients with prostate s
✍ Hidayatullah G. Munshi; Kenneth J. Pienta; David C. Smith πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 72 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## BACKGROUND. A Phase II study was initiated to evaluate the effectiveness of an oral regimen of etoposide and estramustine in patients with early recurrent prostate carcinoma. ## METHODS. Patients with early recurrent prostate carcinoma as indicated by an increasing prostate specific antigen