Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) in esophageal cancer were reviewed. Their value and significance in the areas of multimodality therapy, lymphadenectomy, surgical techniques, palliative treatments, and perioperative management were evaluated. Much has been gained through RCT in the man
Value of clinical trials
β Scribed by F. Sinks, Lucius
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 18 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0098-1532
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
To the Editor: The recent "Cancer Controversies" papers in Medical and Pediatric Oncology dealt with one of the issues concerning clinical trials, i.e., the debate over whether or not they are derivative. Other aspects should be emphasized, however.
The recent publication in Cancer by La Vecchia et al. very effectively demonstrates the value of clinical trials . The authors stress that not only have such trials provided the mechanism for testing medical hypotheses in man but, more importantly, randomized clinical investigations have been the single most important instrument in reducing the mortality in children with cancer. Moreover, the information presented by La Vecchia and colleagues is so powerful that it is hard for this investigator to accept the argument often advanced that clinical trials are not cost effective. D'Angio in his "Cancer Contro-versies" paper quotes the results of the National Wilms Tumor Study that demonstrate very clearly the cost effectiveness of this particular trial .
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
When a graduate student volunteers for a clinical trial, she soon discovers the study is all about arousalβhers, to be exact, in the most intimate of settings. When she can't help but fantasize about the gorgeous female scientist, every lustful twinge shows up on the record. Three stories in oneβfro
I present a method of sequential analysis for randomized clinical trials that allows use of all prior data in a trial to determine the use and weighting of subsequent observations. One continues to assign subjects until one has 'used up' all the variance of the test statistic. There are many strateg
Two important papers by Schwartz and Lellouch have drawn distinctions between explanatory and pragmatic attitudes to clinical trials, and between individual and collective ethics. The pragmatic approach accords with the widespread use of 'intention-to-treat' analyses, but recent research has started