Relevance in Argumentation
β Douglas N. Walton
π Library
π
2003
π English
β¦ LIBER β¦
π
Topical Relevance in Argumentation
β Scribed by Douglas Walton
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Year
- 1982
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 89
- Series
- Pragmatics & Beyond
- Category
- Library
β¬ Acquire This Volume
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
It is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being βirrelevantβ. This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevance logics and relatedness logics, are juxtaposed against conversational criticisms of irrelevance in natural argumentation, e.g. in parliamentary debates. The object is to see if there is a reasonable way of evaluating criticisms like βThatβs beside the point!β or βThatβs irrelevant!β.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Relevance in Argumentation
β Douglas Walton
π Library
π
2003
π Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
π English
In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which an argument, or part of
Relevance in Argumentation
β Douglas Walton
π Library
π
2003
π Routledge
π English
Relevance In Argumentation
π Fiction
Relevance in Argumentation
β Douglas Walton
π Library
π
2003
π Routledge
π English
This volume is intended for graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in field using argumentation theory - law (in particular, evidence law), artificial intelligence (especially multi-agent computing), linguistics, cognitive science, and speech communication, in addition to philosophy. The work a
Relevant Topics in Eating Disorders
β I. Jauregui-Lobera
π Library
π
2012
π Intech
π English