In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which an argument, or part of
Relevance in Argumentation
β Scribed by Douglas N. Walton
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 328
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This volume is intended for graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in field using argumentation theory - law (in particular, evidence law), artificial intelligence (especially multi-agent computing), linguistics, cognitive science, and speech communication, in addition to philosophy. The work a
It is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being βirrelevantβ. This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevance logics a
<p><span>A fresh look at the development of Paul's argument in Romans</span></p><p><span> The Greek word </span><span>gar</span><span> occurs 144 times in Romans and 1,041 times in the entire New Testament. However, many instances of this connective defy easy definition, and the English translation