## Abstract A 2D multislice spin‐lock (MS‐SL) MR pulse sequence is presented for rapid volumetric __T__~1ρ~‐weighted imaging. Image quality is compared with __T__~1ρ~‐weighted data collected using a single‐slice (SS) SL sequence and __T__~2~‐weighted data from a standard MS spin‐echo (SE) sequence.
Three-dimensional T1ρ-weighted MRI at 1.5 Tesla
✍ Scribed by Arijitt Borthakur; Andrew Wheaton; Sridhar R. Charagundla; Erik M. Shapiro; Ravinder R. Regatte; Sarma V. S. Akella; J. Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 476 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To design and implement a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequence capable of performing three‐dimensional T~1ρ~‐weighted MRI on a 1.5‐T clinical scanner, and determine the optimal sequence parameters, both theoretically and experimentally, so that the energy deposition by the radiofrequency pulses in the sequence, measured as the specific absorption rate (SAR), does not exceed safety guidelines for imaging human subjects.
Materials and Methods
A three‐pulse cluster was pre‐encoded to a three‐dimensional gradient‐echo imaging sequence to create a three‐dimensional, T~1ρ~‐weighted MRI pulse sequence. Imaging experiments were performed on a GE clinical scanner with a custom‐built knee‐coil. We validated the performance of this sequence by imaging articular cartilage of a bovine patella and comparing T~1ρ~ values measured by this sequence to those obtained with a previously tested two‐dimensional imaging sequence. Using a previously developed model for SAR calculation, the imaging parameters were adjusted such that the energy deposition by the radiofrequency pulses in the sequence did not exceed safety guidelines for imaging human subjects. The actual temperature increase due to the sequence was measured in a phantom by a MRI‐based temperature mapping technique. Following these experiments, the performance of this sequence was demonstrated in vivo by obtaining T~1ρ~‐weighted images of the knee joint of a healthy individual.
Results
Calculated T~1ρ~ of articular cartilage in the specimen was similar for both and three‐dimensional and two‐dimensional methods (84 ± 2 msec and 80 ± 3 msec, respectively). The temperature increase in the phantom resulting from the sequence was 0.015°C, which is well below the established safety guidelines. Images of the human knee joint in vivo demonstrate a clear delineation of cartilage from surrounding tissues.
Conclusion
We developed and implemented a three‐dimensional T~1ρ~‐weighted pulse sequence on a 1.5‐T clinical scanner. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:730–736. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A reduced specific absorption rate (SAR) version of the __T__~1ρ~‐weighted MR pulse sequence was designed and implemented. The reduced SAR method employs a partial __k__‐space acquisition approach in which a full power spin‐lock pulse is applied to only the central phase‐encode lines of
Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) of protons contributing to the functional signal can be determined from diffusion weighted functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. An earlier study indicated that ADCs calculated from the functional signal of an activated primary sensorimotor cortex
## Abstract ## Purpose To implement and validate a three‐dimensional (3D) T1 measurement technique that is suitable for delayed gadolinium (Gd)‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and can be easily implemented with clinically available pulse sequences at 1.5T and 3.0T. ## Materials and Methods A
## Abstract Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is capable of detecting task‐induced blood oxygenation changes using susceptibility sensitive pulse sequences such as gradient‐recalled echo‐planar imaging (EPI). The local signal increases seen in the time course are believed to be due to an
## Abstract ## Purpose: To compare three‐dimensional fast spin echo Cube (3D‐FSE‐Cube) with conventional 2D‐FSE in MR imaging of the wrist. ## Materials and Methods: The wrists of 10 volunteers were imaged in a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner using an eight‐channel wrist coil. The 3D‐FSE‐Cube images were