There have been several papers published recently which differ significantly on the energy and nature of the 1 A, T-W.\* state of formaldehyde. Buenker and Peyerimhoff [l] using a basis set without diffuse orbitals obtained an.excitation ener,g of 11.72 eV. In this calculation the T-W\_\* state appe
The π, π* state in formaldehyde and thioformaldehyde
✍ Scribed by F. Grein; M. R. J. Hachey
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 858 KB
- Volume
- 60
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7608
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
For formaldehyde, the C -0 stretch potential of '(T, r*) crosses all 'A, Rydberg \r, r* + 2 system to these Rydberg states. For thioformaldehyde, the situation is similar but a shift in the potentials allows for direct observation of '(r, T * ) . In its ' ( T , T * ) state, H,CO is planar, having a low barrier of about 0.2 eV toward the nonplanar '(v, T * > state. For H,CS, the planar conformation of ' ( T , r*) is a saddle point, with '(v, r*) being the global minimum on the 2'A' surface. The triplet r, r* states of H,CO and H,CS are nonplanar, having inversion barriers of 0.1 and 0.05 eV, respectively. For both H,CO and H,CS, the T , r* configuration also crosses the ground-state configuration, which explains predissociation and radiationless transitions of some Rydberg states. otentials, such as n, 3p,, n, 3d,,, etc., thereby transferring the intensity of the unassigned
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The O-O band maGmum of the transition T3(n, r\*) .-T1 (n, n\*) of acridine occurs at = 10200 + 20 cm-' in inert (nhcxme. benzene. Ccl& at 10220 2 20 cm -I in polar (acetonitrile) and St 10170 i 50 cm-1 in hydrogen-bonding, (methanol, 2propanol and alkaline lvater) solsents. Based on the solvent-inde