Two bioanalytical methods have been developed and validated utilizing high flow high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for on-line purification of plasma and serum samples and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for detection and quantitation. Each plasma or serum sample, after mixing with an aqueous solution of the internal standard, was injected into a small diameter (1 Γ 50 mm) column packed with large particles of OASIS (30 mm), with a 100% aqueous mobile phase at a high flow rate (3-4 mL/min). The combination of the high linear speed (6-8 cm/s) of the aqueous mobile phase and the large particle size resulted in the rapid passage of the proteins and other large biomolecules through the column while the small-molecule analytes were retained on the column. During this purification period, the HPLC effluent was directed to waste. After the purification step, the HPLC mobile phase was rapidly changed from 100% aqueous to 100% organic, the flow was reduced to 0.5-0.8 mL/min, and the column effluent was directed towards the mass spectrometer. The small molecule analytes were eluted during this period. In the method developed and validated for the quantitative determination of compound I in rat plasma (method A), the same OASIS column (1 Γ 50 mm, 30 mm) served as the purification and analytical (elution) column. In the method developed for the simultaneous determination of pravastatin and its positional isomer biotransformation product (SQ-31906) in human serum (method B), the purification column was connected to a conventional C18 analytical column (3.9 Γ 50 mm, 5 mm) to achieve the required chromatographic separation between the two isomers. For method A, where 50 mL of rat plasma mixed 1:1 with water containing the internal standard was injected, the standard curve range was 1 to 1000 ng/mL. For method B, where 200 mL of a human serum sample mixed 4:1 with water containing the internal standard was injected, the standard curve range was 0.5 to 100 ng/mL. The total analysis time for each method was 5 min per sample. The accuracy, inter-day precision and intra-day precision were within 10% for both methods.