๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The Two Period Binary Response Cross-Over Trial

โœ Scribed by Dr. N. J. D. Nagelkerke; A. A. M. Hart; J. Oosting


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
368 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0323-3847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The cross-over deeign for clinical trials when responses are binary is discuseed. Three testa whicli have been proposed for the analysis of this problem are compared by an Bssessment of their Baeumptione. A simple test to cetablish whether it is appropriate to include observetione from the second period is presented.

Key wwh: Cross-over design ; Clinical trials ; Hypothesis testing ; Carry-over effects.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Binary Responses and the Three-period Cr
โœ G. H. Morrey ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 478 KB

Problems with carry-over effects in the simple two-period crowover have lead to interest in more complex crow-over designs. A method for analping the optimum two-treatment three-period design with binaryresponse variables is given by making a simple extension to Gart's logistic model.The method give

Testing Hypotheses in the Two-period Cha
โœ Dr. H. Zimmermann; V. Rahlfs ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 350 KB

The paper propowe a general model for analyeizing two-period change-over deaigne with binary data. The model includes testa for carry-over effecta, treatment and period effede in analogy to the well-known ANOVA-model for oontinuoue data. Minimum modified Xtetatistice are derived and formulae for dea

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR TWO-SEQUENCE THR
โœ SHEIN-CHUNG CHOW; JUN SHAO ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 211 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

In clinical trials, and in bioavailability and bioequivalence studies, one often encounters replicate cross-over designs such as a two-sequence three-period cross-over design to assess treatment and carry-over effects of two formulations of a drug product. Because of the potential dropout (or for so

ROBUST PROCEDURES FOR ANALYSING A TWO-PE
โœ K. T. TSAI; H. L. PATEL ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 617 KB

Pate1 analysed a two-period cross-over design with baseline measurements assuming bivariate normality for the joint distribution of the period responses. In this paper, we propose non-parametric methods for analysing this design, including the use of the Wilcoxon rank sum test to derive the prelimin

Randomization and Additivity in the Two-
โœ Prof. Richard McHugh; Orlando Gomez-Marin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 427 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

I n certain a r m of medical reeearch, the two-period CrOBBOVer deaign is a frequent choice for comparing treatmentsA and B in a randomized clinicel trial. Earlier work by Grizzle and by Brown WBB baaed upon a parametric theory linear model. Recenfly, the present authom employed D. R. Cox's additive

Non-Parametric Methods for the 2-Period-
โœ Prof. Dr. E. Brunner; Dr. N. Neumann ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 571 KB

X nonperametric analysis for the two period cross-over design has first been suggested by KOCH (1972) and has been diecussed by HILLS and ABMITAGE (1979). As known rank teats on s u m or differenof the data are applied in this procedure, the results on the one hand am not invariant under monotonous