๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The renal-sparing efficacy of basiliximab in adult living donor liver transplantation

โœ Scribed by Chih-Che Lin; Feng-Rong Chuang; Chih-Hsiung Lee; Chih-Chi Wang; Yaw-Sen Chen; Yueh-Wei Liu; Bruno Jawan; Chao-Long Chen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
101 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The purpose of this study is to find out whether basiliximab administration will improve postoperative renal function by delaying the start of tacrolimus and decreasing of dosage requirement for tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Forty-five adult LDLT recipients were enrolled in the study. The induction group (n = 27) was given basiliximab 20 mg on days 0 and 4; tacrolimus administration was delayed until renal function improved. The control group (n = 18) did not receive basiliximab; tacrolimus was given on the first postoperative day. Trough levels of tacrolimus in the induction and control groups were aimed to be maintained at 5-10 ng/ml and 10-15 ng/ml during the first week after transplant, respectively. The median follow-up was 22 months (range 10-34 months). The preoperative conditions were poorer in the induction group (Child C, 56% vs. 33%, P = 0.01; UNOS 2a, 15% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). The intraoperative blood loss was also higher in the induction group than in the control group (median 2,180 ml vs. 495 ml, P < 0.01). The median delay in tacrolimus administration in the induction group was 36 hours (range 24-108 hours). Serum creatinine levels at second and third postoperative months were significantly lower in the induction group. The creatinine clearance rate in the induction group was higher at the third month posttransplant (median 72 vs. 57 ml/minute, P = 0.04). The incidence of renal insufficiency was significantly lower in the induction group at the third month posttransplant (26% vs. 67%, P < 0.01). Blood cholesterol level at the sixth month posttransplant was lower in the induction group (median 152 vs. 196 mg/dl P = 0.03). The incidences of acute cellular rejection, bacteremia, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection were similar in both groups. In conclusion, for pretransplant critical patients with more intraoperative blood loss, basiliximab induction could prevent early renal dysfunction by delaying the start of tacrolimus and reducing the dose requirement of tacrolimus without increasing graft rejection and infection. Furthermore, it also improved renal function as well as lowered cholesterol levels within 6 months after transplantation.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Outcomes of living donor liver transplan
โœ Jeffrey Campsen; Andres T. Blei; Jean C. Emond; James E. Everhart; Chris E. Frei ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 113 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and

Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to
โœ James F. Trotter; Karen A. Wisniewski; Norah A. Terrault; James E. Everhart; Mil ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 126 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of

Outcomes of adult living donor liver tra
โœ Kim M. Olthoff; Michael M. Abecassis; Jean C. Emond; Igal Kam; Robert M. Merion; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 415 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The study objectives were to determine whether the findings of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) reflect the U.S. national experience and to define risk factors for patient mortality and graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A2ALL previousl

Is the Cost of Adult Living Donor Liver
โœ Mark W. Russo; Robert S. Brown Jr. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 56 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Background. An important long-term consideration for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation. LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluation, donor surgery, and postoperative donor care m

Advances in adult living donor liver tra
โœ Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 83 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

In 1993, the Shinshu Group performed the first successful adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). During the first 10 years of LDLT, many technical innovations have been reported. The major limitation of LDLT for adult recipients is the size of the graft. To overcome the problem, s

Adult living donor transplants-which por
โœ Abhi Humar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 55 KB

Hypothesis: Few studies have investigated the results of research focused on living donor adult liver transplantation. Different characteristics between right-and left-lobe grafts have not yet been clarified in living-donor adult liver transplantation. Left-lobe grafts remain an important option, ev