๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Adult living donor transplants-which portion of the liver to use?

โœ Scribed by Abhi Humar


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
55 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Hypothesis: Few studies have investigated the results of research focused on living donor adult liver transplantation. Different characteristics between right-and left-lobe grafts have not yet been clarified in living-donor adult liver transplantation. Left-lobe grafts remain an important option, even in adult recipients. Setting: A single liver transplant center with a long history of hepatic resection. Patients: Forty-five donors received left-lobe (n โ€ซุโ€ฌ 39) and right-lobe (n โ€ซุโ€ฌ 6) grafts. The clinicopathologic data for the donor, graft, and recipient were compared. All left-lobe grafts were extended grafts that included the middle hepatic vein, and 24 of the 39 left-lobe grafts included the left caudate lobe. No right-lobe graft included a middle hepatic vein. Results: The postoperative aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin values of the donor in the right-lobe graft group were higher, and the postoperative hospital stay was longer than in the left-lobe graft group. Graft weight in the left-lobe graft group was lighter than in the right-lobe graft group (median weight, 450 vs 675 g).

The median graft weight divided by the standard liver volume in the left-lobe graft group was 41% (range, 21%-66%), compared with 52% (range, 47%-75%) in the right-lobe graft group. We found no difference in terms of the incidence of postoperative complications between groups. No difference in induced complications of small-for-size grafts such as intractable ascites and persistent hyperbilirubinemia was evident between groups. The survival rate for grafts at 18 months was 75.0% in the right-lobe graft group compared with 85.6% in the left-lobe group. In the right-lobe graft group, we found a few cases in which a marked poorperfusion area in the anterior segment caused liver dysfunction. Conclusions: Left-lobe grafts are a feasible option for living-donor adult liver transplantation, and in the case of right-lobe grafts, hepatic venous drainage is one of the most critical problems.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Outcomes of living donor liver transplan
โœ Jeffrey Campsen; Andres T. Blei; Jean C. Emond; James E. Everhart; Chris E. Frei ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 113 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and

Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to
โœ James F. Trotter; Karen A. Wisniewski; Norah A. Terrault; James E. Everhart; Mil ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 126 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of

Outcomes of adult living donor liver tra
โœ Kim M. Olthoff; Michael M. Abecassis; Jean C. Emond; Igal Kam; Robert M. Merion; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 415 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The study objectives were to determine whether the findings of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) reflect the U.S. national experience and to define risk factors for patient mortality and graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A2ALL previousl

Feasibility of adult-to-adult living don
โœ Toru Ikegami; Akinobu Taketomi; Yuji Soejima; Yoshihiko Maehara ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 45 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

We read with interest the article by Campsen et al. 1 describing the outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. They described 2 concerns in applying LDLT for ALF: appropriate donor evaluation during the rapid evolution of

Donor quality of life before and after a
โœ See Ching Chan; Chi Leung Liu; Chung Mau Lo; Banny K. Lam; Evelyn W. Lee; Sheung ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 237 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is a major surgical operation for the benefit of the recipient. Justification of procedure mandates knowledge of the possible physical and psychological negative effects on the donor. We prospectively and longitudina