For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and
Outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation: Comparison of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study and the national experience
โ Scribed by Kim M. Olthoff; Michael M. Abecassis; Jean C. Emond; Igal Kam; Robert M. Merion; Brenda W. Gillespie; Lan Tong; the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study Group
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 415 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.22288
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The study objectives were to determine whether the findings of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) reflect the U.S. national experience and to define risk factors for patient mortality and graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A2ALL previously identified risk factors for mortality after LDLT, which included early center experience, older recipient age, and longer cold ischemia time. LDLT procedures at 9 A2ALL centers (n ยผ 702) and 67 non-A2ALL centers (n ยผ 1664) from January 1998 through December 2007 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were analyzed. Potential predictors of time from transplantation to death or graft failure were tested using Cox regression. No significant difference in overall mortality between A2ALL and non-A2ALL centers was found. Higher hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with donor age (HR ยผ 1.13 per 10 years, P ยผ 0.0002), recipient age (HR ยผ 1.20 per 10 years, P ยผ 0.0003), serum creatinine levels (HR ยผ 1.52 per loge unit increase, P < 0.0001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR ยผ 2.12, P<0.0001) or hepatitis C virus (HR ยผ 1.18, P ยผ 0.026), intensive care unit stay (HR ยผ 2.52, P< 0.0001) or hospitalization (HR ยผ 1.62, P < 0.0001) versus home, earlier center experience (LDLT case number 15: HR ยผ 1.61, P < 0.0001, and a cold ischemia time >4.5 hours (HR ยผ 1.79, P ยผ 0.0006). Except for center experience, risk factor effects between A2ALL and non-A2ALL centers were not significantly different. Variables associated with graft loss were identified and showed similar trends. In conclusion, mortality and graft loss risk factors were similar in A2ALL and non-A2ALL centers. These analyses demonstrate that findings from the A2ALL consortium are relevant to other centers in the U.S. performing
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Adult-to-Adult living Donor liver Transplantation Cohort Study (MALL) iver transplantation is now the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. In 2002, more
The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, specifically donor outcomes. A systematic review, with searches of the literature up to January 2004, was undertaken. Two hundred and fourteen studies provided information on don
We read with interest the article by Campsen et al. 1 describing the outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. They described 2 concerns in applying LDLT for ALF: appropriate donor evaluation during the rapid evolution of